Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26709926›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

The Use of Hypnotics and Mortality--A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tzuo-Yun Lan, Ya-Fang Zeng, Gau-Jun Tang, Hui-Chuan Kao, Hsien-Jane Chiu, Tsuo-Hung Lan, Hsiao-Feng Ho

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Use of Sedative-Hypnotics and Mortality: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tzuo-Yun LanInstitute of Hospital & Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ya-Fang ZengInstitute of Hospital & Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Gau-Jun TangInstitute of Hospital & Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hui-Chuan KaoDepartment of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Hsien-Jane ChiuMin-Sheng General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tsuo-Hung LanDepartment of Psychiatry, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Feng HoNational Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TWMin Sheng General Hospital · TWTzu Chi University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep disorders, especially chronic insomnia, have become major health problem worldwide and, as a result, the use of hypnotics is steadily increasing. However, few studies with a large sample size and long-term observation have been conducted to investigate the relationship between specific hypnotics and mortality.

methodsWe conducted this retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Information from claims data including basic characteristics, the use of hypnotics, and survival from 2000 to 2009 for 1,320,322 individuals were included. The use of hypnotics was divided into groups using the defined daily dose and the cumulative length of use. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated from a Cox proportional hazards model, with two different matching techniques to examine the associations.

resultsCompared to the non-users, both users of benzodiazepines (HR = 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.78-1.85) and mixed users (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.42-1.47) had a higher risk of death, whereas the users of other non-benzodiazepines users showed no differences. Zolpidem users (HR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.71-0.75) exhibited a lower risk of mortality in the adjusted models. This pattern remained similar in both matching techniques. Secondary analysis indicated that zolpidem users had a reduced risk of major cause-specific mortality except cancer, and that this protective effect was dose-responsive, with those using for more than 1 year having the lowest risk.

conclusionsThe effects of different types of hypnotics on mortality were diverse in this large cohort with long-term follow-up based on representative claims data in Taiwan. The use of zolpidem was associated with a reduced risk of mortality.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPyridinesRetrospective StudiesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersZolpidemBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesPyridinesZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID26709926
PMCPMC4692546
OpenAlexW2209821970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.