Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26709748›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Folding and Characterization of a Bio-responsive Robot from DNA Origami.

Yaniv Amir, Almogit Abu-Horowitz, Ido Bachelet

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Signalling and social learning in swarms of robots.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Design and Synthesis of a Reconfigurable DNA Accordion Rack.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaniv AmirFaculty of Life Sciences and the Institute for Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University.
Almogit Abu-HorowitzFaculty of Life Sciences and the Institute for Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University.
Ido BacheletFaculty of Life Sciences and the Institute for Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University; ido.bachelet@biu.ac.il.
Bar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA nanorobot is a hollow hexagonal nanometric device, designed to open in response to specific stimuli and present cargo sequestered inside. Both stimuli and cargo can be tailored according to specific needs. Here we describe the DNA nanorobot fabrication protocol, with the use of the DNA origami technique. The procedure initiates by mixing short single-strand DNA staples into a stock mixture which is then added to a long, circular, single-strand DNA scaffold in presence of a folding buffer. A standard thermo cycler is programmed to gradually lower the mixing reaction temperature to facilitate the staples-to-scaffold annealing, which is the guiding force behind the folding of the nanorobot. Once the 60 hr folding reaction is complete, excess staples are discarded using a centrifugal filter, followed by visualization via agarose-gel electrophoresis (AGE). Finally, successful fabrication of the nanorobot is verified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), with the use of uranyl-formate as negative stain.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationDNADNA, Single-StrandedElectrophoresis, Agar GelMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanostructuresRoboticsStaining and LabelingDNADNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID26709748
PMCPMC4692774
OpenAlexW2196379377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.