Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26709543›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2015

Intron or no intron: a matter for nuclear pore complexes.

Amandine Bonnet, Benoit Palancade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amandine Bonneta Institut Jacques Monod; CNRS; UMR 7592; Univ Paris Diderot ; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Paris , France.
Benoit Palancadea Institut Jacques Monod; CNRS; UMR 7592; Univ Paris Diderot ; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Paris , France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) have been shown to regulate distinct steps of the gene expression process, from transcription to mRNA export. In particular, mRNAs expressed from intron-containing genes are surveyed by a specific NPC-dependent quality control pathway ensuring that unspliced mRNAs are retained within the nucleus. In this Extra View, we summarize the different approaches that have been developed to evaluate the contribution of various NPC components to the expression of intron-containing genes. We further present the mechanistic models that could account for pre-mRNA retention at the nuclear side of NPCs. Finally, we discuss the possibility that other stages of intron-containing gene expression could be regulated by nuclear pores, in particular through the regulation of mRNA biogenesis factors by the NPC-associated SUMO protease Ulp1.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusCysteine EndopeptidasesIntronsModels, MolecularNuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSumoylationTranscription, GeneticCysteine EndopeptidasesNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUlp1 proteasemRNA exportmRNA quality controlmRNA transcriptionnuclear pore complexesSUMO-protease Ulp1sumoylationTHO/TREX complex

Identifiers

PMID26709543
PMCPMC4915510
OpenAlexW2339328439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.