Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26709361›Full record

ReviewJournal of radiation oncology

Predictors of clinical response to immunotherapy with or without radiotherapy.

Susan M Hiniker, Holden T Maecker, Susan J Knox

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tumor-Mediated Neutrophil Polarization and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Drug resistance and new therapies in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan M HinikerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847 USA.
Holden T MaeckerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Susan J KnoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847 USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Success with recent immunotherapies has resulted in previously unattainable response rates, as well as durable responses in diseases with historically poor prognoses. The combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy has been a recent area of active investigation, with exciting results in a subset of patients. However, patient characteristics predictive of probable benefit from therapy and clinically meaningful biomarkers indicative of the early development of an antitumor immune response have yet to be identified. What is needed is a better way to predict which patients are likely to benefit from therapy, which would allow those patients unlikely to benefit from immunotherapy to be spared potentially futile therapies, thereby avoiding unnecessary risks of toxicity and costly treatment. Here, we summarize the early data on predictors of clinical response to immunotherapy, and to immunotherapy in combination with radiation.

Indexed as

Abscopal effectBiomarkersImmunotherapyPredictors of responseRadiation

Identifiers

PMID26709361
PMCPMC4685037
OpenAlexW1943553822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.