ArticleCurrent bladder dysfunction reports2014
Future Perspectives in Bladder Tissue Engineering.
Article in Current bladder dysfunction reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances and future directions in urinary system tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Tissue Engineering in Pediatric Bladder Reconstruction-The Road to Success.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Engineering molecular imaging strategies for regenerative medicine.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2018Review
- Folding artificial mucosa with cell-laden hydrogels guided by mechanics models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Bladder biomechanics and the use of scaffolds for regenerative medicine in the urinary bladder.Nature reviews. Urology · 2018Review
- Whyever bladder tissue engineering clinical applications still remain unusual even though many intriguing technological advances have been reached?Il Giornale di chirurgiaReview
- The Management of the Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder.Current bladder dysfunction reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Substantial clinical need persists for improved autologous tissues to augment or replace the urinary bladder and research has begun to address this using tissue engineering techniques. The implantation of both tissue scaffolds which allow for native bladder tissue ingrowth and autologous bladder grafts created from in vitro cellularization of such scaffolds have been tested clinically; however, successful outcomes in both scenarios have been challenged by insufficient vascularity resulting from large graft sizes, which subsequently limits tissue ingrowth and leads to central graft ischemia. Consequently, recent research has focused on developing better methods to produce scaffolds with increased tissue ingrowth and vascularity. This review provides an update on bladder tissue engineering and outlines the challenges that remain to clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.