Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26708987›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2015

Biocuration with insufficient resources and fixed timelines.

Raul Rodriguez-Esteban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New reasons for biologists to write with a formal language.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Re-curation and rational enrichment of knowledge graphs in Biological Expression Language.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  8. Involving community in genes and pathway curation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Raul Rodriguez-EstebanRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, pRED Informatics, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel 4070, Switzerland raul.rodriguez-esteban@roche.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological curation, or biocuration, is often studied from the perspective of creating and maintaining databases that have the goal of mapping and tracking certain areas of biology. However, much biocuration is, in fact, dedicated to finite and time-limited projects in which insufficient resources demand trade-offs. This typically more ephemeral type of curation is nonetheless of importance in biomedical research. Here, I propose a framework to understand such restricted curation projects from the point of view of return on curation (ROC), value, efficiency and productivity. Moreover, I suggest general strategies to optimize these curation efforts, such as the 'multiple strategies' approach, as well as a metric called overhead that can be used in the context of managing curation resources.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicData CurationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26708987
PMCPMC4691339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.