Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26708100›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2016

Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation: Part 2--application to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human carcinoma cells.

Micaela Cunha, Etienne Testa, Olga V Komova, Elena A Nasonova, Larisa A Mel'nikova, Nina L Shmakova, Michaël Beuve

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Micaela CunhaUniversité de Lyon, 69622, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-1502
Etienne TestaUniversité de Lyon, 69622, Lyon, France.
Olga V KomovaLaboratory of Radiation Biology, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Elena A NasonovaLaboratory of Radiation Biology, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Larisa A Mel'nikovaLaboratory of Radiation Biology, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Nina L ShmakovaLaboratory of Radiation Biology, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Michaël BeuveUniversité de Lyon, 69622, Lyon, France. m.beuve@ipnl.in2p3.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological phenomena observed at low doses of ionizing radiation (adaptive response, bystander effects, genomic instability, etc.) are still not well understood. While at high irradiation doses, cellular death may be directly linked to DNA damage, at low doses, other cellular structures may be involved in what are known as non-(DNA)-targeted effects. Mitochondria, in particular, may play a crucial role through their participation in a signaling network involving oxygen/nitrogen radical species. According to the size of the implicated organelles, the fluctuations in the energy deposited into these target structures may impact considerably the response of cells to low doses of ionizing irradiation. Based on a recent simulation of these fluctuations, a theoretical framework was established to have further insight into cell responses to low doses of photon irradiation, namely the triggering of radioresistance mechanisms by energy deposition into specific targets. Three versions of a model are considered depending on the target size and on the number of targets that need to be activated by energy deposition to trigger radioresistance mechanisms. These model versions are applied to the fraction of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations measured at low doses in human carcinoma cells (CAL51). For this cell line, it was found in the present study that the mechanisms of radioresistance could not be triggered by the activation of a single small target (nanometric size, 100 nm), but could instead be triggered by the activation of a large target (micrometric, 10 μm) or by the activation of a great number of small targets. The mitochondria network, viewed either as a large target or as a set of small units, might be concerned by these low-dose effects.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhotonsCell Line, TumorChromosome AberrationsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansCAL51Chromosomal aberrationsLow doseMicrodosimetryModelingNanodosimetryNon-targeted effectsRadiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.