ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2016
An unsupervised learning method to identify reference intervals from a clinical database.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of pathological fluctuations versus biological variation on the interpretation of laboratory values.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning for Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control (PBRTQC), Analytical and Preanalytical Error Detection in Clinical Laboratory.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Early-stage pregnancy recognition on microblogs: Machine learning and lexicon-based approaches.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Clinlabomics: leveraging clinical laboratory data by data mining strategies.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Applications of machine learning in routine laboratory medicine: Current state and future directions.Clinical biochemistry · 2022Review
- Comparison of reference distributions acquired by direct and indirect sampling techniques: exemplified with the Pediatric Reference Interval in China (PRINCE) study.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Learning decision thresholds for risk stratification models from aggregate clinician behavior.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Indirect reference intervals for haematological parameters in capillary blood of pre-school children.Biochemia medica · 2021Article
- Clinical thresholds for diagnosing iron deficiency: comparison of functional assessment of serum ferritin to population based centiles.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Indirect Reference Intervals: Harnessing the Power of Stored Laboratory Data.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2019Review
- When to re-order laboratory tests? Learning laboratory test shelf-life.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018Article
- Estimating summary statistics for electronic health record laboratory data for use in high-throughput phenotyping algorithms.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reference intervals are critical for the interpretation of laboratory results. The development of reference intervals using traditional methods is time consuming and costly. An alternative approach, known as an a posteriori method, requires an expert to enumerate diagnoses and procedures that can affect the measurement of interest. We develop a method, LIMIT, to use laboratory test results from a clinical database to identify ICD9 codes that are associated with extreme laboratory results, thus automating the a posteriori method. LIMIT was developed using sodium serum levels, and validated using potassium serum levels, both tests for which harmonized reference intervals already exist. To test LIMIT, reference intervals for total hemoglobin in whole blood were learned, and were compared with the hemoglobin reference intervals found using an existing a posteriori approach. In addition, prescription of iron supplements were used to identify individuals whose hemoglobin levels were low enough for a clinician to choose to take action. This prescription data indicating clinical action was then used to estimate the validity of the hemoglobin reference interval sets. Results show that LIMIT produces usable reference intervals for sodium, potassium and hemoglobin laboratory tests. The hemoglobin intervals produced using the data driven approaches consistently had higher positive predictive value and specificity in predicting an iron supplement prescription than the existing intervals. LIMIT represents a fast and inexpensive solution for calculating reference intervals, and shows that it is possible to use laboratory results and coded diagnoses to learn laboratory test reference intervals from clinical data warehouses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.