Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26707455›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2016

Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study.

Ariana E Anderson, Wesley T Kerr, April Thames, Tong Li, Jiayang Xiao, Mark S Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PheWJAMIA open · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Automated Type 2 Diabetes Case and Control Identification from the MIMIC-IV Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Remission of type 2 diabetes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: diabetes prediction score.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Using Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High-throughput phenotyping with temporal sequences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariana E AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Wesley T KerrDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, United States. Electronic address: WesleyTK@UCLA.edu.
April ThamesDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Tong LiDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Jiayang XiaoDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Mark S CohenDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; Departments of Psychology, Neurology, Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · USCalifornia NanoSystems Institute · US

Funding

UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM008042 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AJIJOLA, OLUJIMI A, DAWSON, DAVID WAYNE · 1985 to 2023
$29.9M
Systems in Integrative BiologyT32GM008185 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHOU, TOM · 1987 to 2022
$4.6M
Real-Time Automated Detection of Craving States with fMRI and EEGR33DA026109 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COHEN, MARK STEVEN · 2010 to 2012
$1.7M
Hemodynamic Biomarkers of Healthy and Diseased AgingK25AG051782 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ANDERSON, ARIANA · 2016 to 2020
$667k
Modeling RDoc Dimensions Across Levels of AnalysisR03MH106922 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ANDERSON, ARIANA · 2016 to 2017
$154k
NIA NIH HHS K25 AG051782NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA026109NIDA NIH HHS R33DA026109NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008042NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008185NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM08042NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH106922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAn estimated 25% of type two diabetes mellitus (DM2) patients in the United States are undiagnosed due to inadequate screening, because it is prohibitive to administer laboratory tests to everyone. We assess whether electronic health record (EHR) phenotyping could improve DM2 screening compared to conventional models, even when records are incomplete and not recorded systematically across patients and practice locations, as is typically seen in practice.

methodsIn this cross-sectional, retrospective study, EHR data from 9948 US patients were used to develop a pre-screening tool to predict current DM2, using multivariate logistic regression and a random-forests probabilistic model for out-of-sample validation. We compared (1) a full EHR model containing commonly prescribed medications, diagnoses (as ICD9 categories), and conventional predictors, (2) a restricted EHR DX model which excluded medications, and (3) a conventional model containing basic predictors and their interactions (BMI, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension).

resultsUsing a patient's full EHR or restricted EHR was superior to using basic covariates alone for detecting individuals with diabetes (hierarchical X(2) test, p<0.001). Migraines, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and cardiac dysrhythmias were associated negatively with DM2, while sexual and gender identity disorder diagnosis, viral and chlamydial infections, and herpes zoster were associated positively. Adding EHR phenotypes improved classification; the AUC for the full EHR Model, EHR DX model, and conventional model using logistic regression, were 84.9%, 83.2%, and 75.0% respectively. For random forest machine learning out-of-sample prediction, accuracy also was improved when using EHR phenotypes; the AUC values were 81.3%, 79.6%, and 74.8%, respectively. Improved AUCs reflect better performance for most thresholds that balance sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsEHR phenotyping resulted in markedly superior detection of DM2, even in the face of missing and unsystematically recorded data, based on the ROC curves. EHR phenotypes could more efficiently identify which patients do require, and don't require, further laboratory screening. When applied to the current number of undiagnosed individuals in the United States, we predict that incorporating EHR phenotype screening would identify an additional 400,000 patients with active, untreated diabetes compared to the conventional pre-screening models.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAdultAgedArea Under CurveCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMedical InformaticsMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesElectronic health recordsEvidence-based medicinePhenotypePopulation screeningType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID26707455
PMCPMC5679210
OpenAlexW1816688868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.