Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26707396›Full record

ReviewBioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters2016

Biased agonism: An emerging paradigm in GPCR drug discovery.

Zoran Rankovic, Tarsis F Brust, Laura M Bohn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Agonist-specific conformational dynamics at the βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural Basis of GPCR-Biased Modulation.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Targeting muscarinic receptors for treating schizophrenia.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Kappa opioid receptor control of motivated behavior revisited.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Induced proximity at the cell surface.Nature biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zoran RankovicDiscovery Chemistry and Research Technologies, Eli Lilly and Company, 893 South Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. Electronic address: rankovic_zoran@lilly.com.
Tarsis F BrustDepartment of Molecular Therapeutics, and Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Laura M BohnDepartment of Molecular Therapeutics, and Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA. Electronic address: lbohn@scripps.edu.

Funding

Novel Probes of the Kappa Opioid Receptor: Chemistry, Pharmacology, and BiologyR01DA031927 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Jeffrey Aube, Laura M. Bohn · 2011 to 2026
$8.4M
Synthesis and Evaluation of Functionally Biased Opioid AnalgesicsR01DA033073 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BANNISTER, THOMAS D, BOHN, LAURA M. · 2012 to 2022
$6.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031927NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein coupled receptors have historically been one of the most druggable classes of cellular proteins. The members of this large receptor gene family couple to primary effectors, G proteins, that have built in mechanisms for regeneration and amplification of signaling with each engagement of receptor and ligand, a kinetic event in itself. In recent years GPCRs, have been found to interact with arrestin proteins to initiate signal propagation in the absence of G protein interactions. This pinnacle observation has changed a previously held notion of the linear spectrum of GPCR efficacy and uncovered a new paradigm in GPCR research and drug discovery that relies on multidimensionality of GPCR signaling. Ligands were found that selectively confer activity in one pathway over another, and this phenomenon has been referred to as 'biased agonism' or 'functional selectivity'. While great strides in the understanding of this phenomenon have been made in recent years, two critical questions still dominate the field: How can we rationally design biased GPCR ligands, and ultimately, which physiological responses are due to G protein versus arrestin interactions? This review will discuss the current understanding of some of the key aspects of biased signaling that are related to these questions, including mechanistic insights in the nature of biased signaling and methods for measuring ligand bias, as well as relevant examples of drug discovery applications and medicinal chemistry strategies that highlight the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsArrestinsHumansLigandsModels, MolecularReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledArrestinsLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledBiased ligandDrug discoveryFunctional selectivityGPCR

Identifiers

PMID26707396
PMCPMC5595354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.