ArticleTransplantation proceedings2015
Cardiac Donor Risk Factors Predictive of Short-Term Heart Transplant Recipient Mortality: An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database.
Article in Transplantation proceedings, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart donation and transplant recipient survival outcomes from deceased organ donors managed in hospital-based vs independent donor care units.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025Article
- Just a number? Donor age and (lack of) associated reasons for heart offer refusal.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024Article
- Post-transplant survival after normothermic regional perfusion versus direct procurement and perfusion in donation after circulatory determination of death in heart transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024Observational
- Disparities in donor heart acceptance between the USA and Europe: clinical implications.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Donor Noradrenaline Support Is Not Associated with Decreased Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Heart Transplantation With Older Donors: Should There Be an Age Cutoff?Transplantation proceedings · 2022Article
- Intracerebral bleeding in donors is associated with reduced short-term to midterm survival of heart transplant recipients.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Outcome and Midterm Survival after Heart Transplantation Is Independent from Donor Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Heart Transplant Donor Selection Guidelines: Review and Recommendations.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Commentary: Planes, trains, and automobiles-Effective use of prolonged ex vivo heart preservation.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021Article
- The Effect of Supplemental Cardioplegia Infusion before Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation with Long Ischemic Times.The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
- Clinical-based Cell Therapies for Heart Disease-Current and Future State.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2020Review
- Sex Differences in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.Circulation · 2019Review
- Impact of Donor Obesity on Outcomes After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Temporal Changes on the Risks and Complications of Posttransplantion Diabetes Mellitus Following Cardiac Transplantation.Journal of transplantation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo address the shortage of donor hearts for transplantation, there is significant interest in liberalizing donor acceptance criteria. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac donor characteristics from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to determine their impact on posttransplantation recipient outcomes.
methodsAdult (≥18 years) patients undergoing heart transplantation from July 1, 2004, to December 31, 2012, in the UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) database were reviewed. Patients were stratified by 1-year posttransplantation status; survivors (group S, n = 13,643) and patients who died or underwent cardiac retransplantation at 1-year follow-up (group NS/R = 1785). Thirty-three specific donor variables were collected for each recipient, and independent donor predictors of recipient death or retransplantation at 1 year were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
resultsOverall 1-year survival for the entire cohort was 88.4%. Mean donor age was 31.5 ± 11.9 years, and 72% were male. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, donor age >40 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27 to 1.64), graft ischemic time >3 hours (OR 1.32, 1.16 to 1.51), and the use of cardioplegia (OR 1.17, 1.01 to 1.35) or Celsior (OR 1.21, 1.06 to 1.38) preservative solution were significant predictors of recipient death or retransplantation at 1 year posttransplantation. Male donor sex (OR 0.83, 0.74 to 0.93) and the use of antihypertensive agents (OR 0.88, 0.77 to 1.00) or insulin (OR 0.84, 0.76 to 0.94) were protective from adverse outcomes at 1 year.
conclusionsThese data suggest that donors who are older, female, or have a long projected ischemic time pose greater risk to heart transplant recipients in the short term. Additionally, certain components of donor management protocols, including antihypertensive and insulin administration, may be protective to recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.