Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26706863›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2016

The Social Prioritization Index and Tobacco Use Among Young Adult Bar Patrons.

Nadra E Lisha, Torsten B Neilands, Jeffrey W Jordan, Louisa M Holmes, Pamela M Ling

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Latent Class Analysis to Examine Patterns of Smoking and Other Tobacco Products in Young Adult Bar Patrons.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of Bar and Nightclub Intervention to Decrease Young Adult Smoking in New Mexico.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadra E LishaUniversity of California San Francisco, CA, USA nadra.lisha@ucsf.edu.
Torsten B NeilandsUniversity of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jeffrey W JordanRescue Social Change Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
Louisa M HolmesUniversity of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Pamela M LingUniversity of California San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Countering Young Adult Tobacco Marketing in BarsU01CA154240 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2011 to 2015
$6.1M
Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlT32CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113710NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social benefits likely play a role in young adult tobacco use. The Social Prioritization Index (SPI) was developed to measure the degree to which young adults place a great importance on their social lives. We examined the usefulness of this measure as a potential predictor of tobacco use controlling for demographics and tobacco-related attitudes. Young adults completed cross-sectional surveys between 2012 and 2014 in bars in seven U.S. cities (N = 5,503). The SPI is a 13-item scale that includes personality items and information on how frequently participants attend bars and how late they stay out. Three step-by-step multinomial regression models were run using the SPI as a predictor of smoking status (nondaily and daily smoking vs. nonsmoking): (1) SPI as the sole predictor, (2) SPI and demographics, and (3) SPI, demographics, and tobacco-related attitude variables. Next, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis to examine if the number of items in SPI could be reduced and retain its strong relationship with smoking. Higher scores on the SPI were related to an increased probability of being a Nondaily Smoker (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [1.04, 1.14], p < .001) or Daily Smoker (odds ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [1.07, 1.22], p < .0001) compared to a Nonsmoker, controlling for demographics and other tobacco-related attitudes. The SPI and reduced SPI were independently related to young adult tobacco use. The measure's brevity, ease of use, and strong association with tobacco use may make it useful to tobacco and other prevention researchers.

Indexed as

AttitudeSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLogistic ModelsMalePsychometricsRegression AnalysisRestaurantsSmokingSmoking Cessationcancer prevention and screeningcommunity health promotionhealth promotionmeasurement issuessmoking and tobacco usetobacco control and policy

Identifiers

PMID26706863
PMCPMC4930892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.