Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26706465›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Results from an Evaluation of the Georgia Colorectal Cancer Control Program's Community Education and Outreach Events, 2013.

Rebecca C Woodruff, April Hermstad, Sally Honeycutt, Melody Brown, Michelle C Kegler

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Empowerment Through Participation in a Cancer Prevention Exhibit: Evidence from the Hygée Lab Intervention.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca C WoodruffBehavioral Sciences and Health Education Department, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop 1518-002-5AA, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. rwoodr2@emory.edu.
April HermstadBehavioral Sciences and Health Education Department, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop 1518-002-5AA, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Sally HoneycuttBehavioral Sciences and Health Education Department, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop 1518-002-5AA, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Melody BrownOffice of Cancer Prevention, Screening and Treatment, Georgia Department of Public Health, 1100 Second Street, Cochran, GA, 31014, USA.
Michelle C KeglerBehavioral Sciences and Health Education Department, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop 1518-002-5AA, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although public health practitioners commonly use community education and outreach events to promote cancer screening, the effectiveness of this strategy remains unclear. This study evaluated 23 outreach events, conducted as part of the Georgia Colorectal Cancer Control Program. Of the estimated 1778 individuals who attended these events, those ages 50-75 were eligible to participate in a telephone survey 3 months after attending an event. Surveys measured colorectal cancer (CRC) risk status, CRC screening history at the time of the event, seeking or obtaining CRC screening at 3-month follow-up, and participants' knowledge of their CRC screening status. Of the 335 individuals contacted for this evaluation, 185 completed the survey. Eighty participants (43.2 %) were at elevated risk for CRC and 99 participants (53.5 %) were at average risk. Of the 99 average-risk participants, the majority (n = 69) were not due for CRC screening at the time they attended an event because they had previously received screening within the recommended time intervals. Thirty average-risk participants were due for CRC screening, either because they had never been screened before (n = 19) or because they were due for rescreening (n = 11). Approximately half of these 30 participants who were due for screening either sought (n = 6, 20.0 %) or obtained screening (n = 8, 26.7 %) 3 months following the event. Community education and outreach events may play an important role in motivating participants to seek or obtain CRC screening, but unless priority audiences are identified and recruited, events may attract people who are already compliant with CRC screening.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGeorgiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationColorectal neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerHealth promotionProgram evaluationUSA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.