Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26705569›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2016

Expectation of sickness absence duration: a review on statements and methods used in guidelines in Europe and North America.

Wout E L de Boer, S Mohsen Mousavi, George L Delclos, Fernando G Benavides, Mercedes Lorente, Regina Kunz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Systematic review: Factors related to injuries in small- and medium-sized enterprises.International journal of critical illness and injury science
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wout E L de Boer1 Swiss Academy of Insurance Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Wout.deboer@usb.ch.
S Mohsen Mousavi1 Swiss Academy of Insurance Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
George L Delclos2 The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA 3 Centre for Research in Occupational Health, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando G Benavides3 Centre for Research in Occupational Health, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercedes Lorente4 Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAMTS), Paris, France.
Regina Kunz1 Swiss Academy of Insurance Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertifying physicians play a key role in the management of sickness absence and are often provided with guidelines. Some of these guidelines contain statements on expected sickness absence duration, according to diagnosis. We were interested in exploring the evidence base of these statements.

methodsWe identified guidelines through a survey of EUMASS members and a literature search of the Internet and PubMed. We extracted the statements and methods from the guidelines. We compared: diagnoses that were addressed, expected durations and development processes followed. Next, we presented our findings to the developers, to afford them an opportunity to comment and/or correct any misinterpretations.

resultsWe identified 4 guidelines from social insurance institutions (France, Serbia, Spain and Sweden) and 4 guidelines from private organisations (1 Netherlands, 3 US). Guidelines addressed between 63 and some 63000 health conditions (ICD 10 codes). Health conditions overlapped among guidelines. Direct comparison is hampered by differences in coding (ICD 9 or 10) and level of aggregation (three or four digit, clustering of diseases and treatment situations). Expectations about duration are defined as minimum, maximum, and optimum or mean or median and percentile distribution, stratified to age and work requirements. In a sample of 5 diagnoses we found overlap in expected duration but also differences. Guidelines are developed differently, pragmatic expert consensus being used most, supplemented with data on sickness absence from different registers, other guidelines and non-systematic literature reviews. The effectiveness of these guidelines has not yet been formally evaluated.

conclusionsExpectations about duration of sickness absence by diagnosis are expressed in several guidelines. The expectations are difficult to compare, their evidence base is unclear and their effectiveness needs to be established.

Indexed as

PolicyPolicy MakingWork Capacity EvaluationEuropeFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleNorth AmericaSick LeaveTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26705569
PMCPMC4804735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.