Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26705393›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology2015

Performance of Particulate Containment at Nanotechnology Workplaces.

Li-Ming Lo, Candace S-J Tsai, Kevin H Dunn, Duane Hammond, David Marlow, Jennifer Topmiller, Michael Ellenbecker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Ming LoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Candace S-J TsaiPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Kevin H DunnCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Duane HammondCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
David MarlowCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Jennifer TopmillerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Michael EllenbeckerUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of engineering controls for the production or use of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was investigated at two facilities. These controls assessments are necessary to evaluate the current status of control performance and to develop proper control strategies for these workplaces. The control systems evaluated in these studies included ventilated enclosures, exterior hoods, and exhaust filtration systems. Activity-based monitoring with direct-reading instruments and filter sampling for microscopy analysis were used to evaluate the effectiveness of control measures at study sites. Our study results showed that weighing CNTs inside the biological safety cabinet can have a 37% reduction on the particle concentration in the worker's breathing zone, and produce a 42% lower area concentration outside the enclosure. The ventilated enclosures used to reduce fugitive emissions from the production furnaces exhibited good containment characteristics when closed, but they failed to contain emissions effectively when opened during product removal/harvesting. The exhaust filtration systems employed for exhausting these ventilated enclosures did not provide promised collection efficiencies for removing engineered nanomaterials from furnace exhaust. The exterior hoods were found to be a challenge for controlling emissions from machining nanocomposites: the downdraft hood effectively contained and removed particles released from the manual cutting process, but using the canopy hood for powered cutting of nanocomposites created 15%-20% higher ultrafine (<500 nm) particle concentrations at the source and at the worker's breathing zone. The microscopy analysis showed that CNTs can only be found at production sources but not at the worker breathing zones during the tasks monitored.

Indexed as

control evaluationemission mitigationengineering controlslocal exhaust ventilationnanomaterial manufacturing

Identifiers

PMID26705393
PMCPMC4685715
OpenAlexW1957215640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.