Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26705231›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2015

Prognostic Significance and Molecular Features of Colorectal Mucinous Adenocarcinomas: A Strobe-Compliant Study.

Mo-Jin Wang, Jie Ping, Yuan Li, Annica Holmqvist, Gunnar Adell, Gunnar Arbman, Hong Zhang, Zong-Guang Zhou, Xiao-Feng Sun

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. CBD: a biomarker database for colorectal cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mo-Jin WangFrom the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive Surgery and State key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China (M-JW, Z-GZ, X-FS); Department of Oncology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (M-JW, JP, AH, GA, X-FS); Department of Paediatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive Surgery and State key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (YL); Department of Surgery, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Norrköping (GA); and School of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden (HZ).
Jie Ping
Yuan Li
Annica Holmqvist
Gunnar Adell
Gunnar Arbman
Hong Zhang
Zong-Guang Zhou
Xiao-Feng Sun

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) is a special histology subtype of colorectal adenocarcinoma. The survival of MC is controversial and the prognostic biomarkers of MC remain unclear. To analyze prognostic significance and molecular features of colorectal MC. This study included 755,682 and 1001 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER, 1973-2011), and Linköping Cancer (LC, 1972-2009) databases. We investigated independently the clinicopathological characteristics, survival, and variety of molecular features from these 2 databases. MC was found in 9.3% and 9.8% patients in SEER and LC, respectively. MC was more frequently localized in the right colon compared with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMC) in both SEER (57.7% vs 37.2%, P < 0.001) and LC (46.9% vs 27.7%, P < 0.001). Colorectal MC patients had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) than NMC patients (SEER, P < 0.001; LC, P = 0.026), prominently in stage III (SEER, P < 0.001; LC, P = 0.023). The multivariate survival analysis showed that MC was independently related to poor prognosis in rectal cancer patients (SEER, hazard ratios [HR], 1.076; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.057-1.096; P < 0.001). In LC, the integrated analysis of genetic and epigenetic features showed that that strong expression of PINCH (HR, 3.954; 95% CI, 1.493-10.47; P = 0.013) and weak expression of RAD50 (HR 0.348, 95% CI, 0.106-1.192; P = 0.026) were significantly associated with poor CSS of colorectal MC patients. In conclusion, the colorectal MC patients had significantly worse CSS than NMC patients, prominently in stage III. MC was an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival in rectal cancer patients. The PINCH and RAD50 were prognostic biomarkers for colorectal MC patients.

Indexed as

Acid Anhydride HydrolasesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleHumansLIM Domain ProteinsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAcid Anhydride HydrolasesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesLIM Domain ProteinsLIMS1 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsRAD50 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26705231
PMCPMC4697997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.