Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704903›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2015

Prognostic value of anti-CRP antibodies in lupus nephritis in long-term follow-up.

Satu Sinikka Pesickova, Romana Rysava, Martin Lenicek, Libor Vitek, Eliska Potlukova, Zdenka Hruskova, Eva Jancova, Eva Honsova, Jakub Zavada, Marten Trendelenburg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Lupus Nephritis Biomarkers: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. The Role of Anti-mCRP Autoantibodies in Lupus Nephritis.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satu Sinikka PesickovaDepartment of Nephrology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. satu.pesickova@gmail.com.
Romana RysavaDepartment of Nephrology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. romana.rysava@vfn.cz.
Martin LenicekInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Katerinska 32, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. mleni@centrum.cz.
Libor VitekInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Katerinska 32, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. vitek@cesnet.cz.
Eliska PotlukovaThird Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. eliska.potlukova@usb.ch.
Zdenka HruskovaDepartment of Nephrology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. zd.hruskova@seznam.cz.
Eva JancovaDepartment of Nephrology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. eva.jancova@volny.cz.
Eva HonsovaDepartment of Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague 4, Czech Republic. evhn@medicon.cz.
Jakub ZavadaInstitute of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Na Slupi 4, 128 50 Prague 2, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz.
Marten TrendelenburgDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. Marten.Trendelenburg@unibas.ch.
Vladimir TesarDepartment of Nephrology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 12808 Prague 2, Czech Republic. vladimir.tesar@vfn.cz.
Charles University · CZGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutoantibodies against monomeric C-reactive protein (anti-CRP-Ab) observed in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) were suggested to be associated with active LN and a poor response to therapy during short-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to confirm this finding and to investigate the prognostic value of anti-CRP-Ab in patients with LN during long-term follow-up.

methodsSera of 57 SLE patients (47 women, 10 men) with biopsy proven LN and 122 healthy individuals were analyzed for the presence of anti-CRP-Ab by in-house ELISA. Anti-CRP-Ab levels were studied in relation to routine laboratory tests, urine analysis, levels of C3, C4, other immunological markers and the overall disease activity as assessed by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). The prognostic value of anti-CRP-Ab was tested in a subgroup of 29 newly diagnosed LN patients (median follow-up 5.9 years). Response to therapy at various time points was assessed with respect to baseline anti-CRP-Ab levels. At least partial response in the first/second year of treatment was considered as a "favorable outcome", while non-response, renal flare or end stage renal disease were considered as "unfavorable outcome".

resultsAnti-CRP-Ab were only detected in patients with active renal disease and their levels correlated with SLEDAI (rs = 0.165, p = 0.002). The time to response was shorter in patients being anti-CRP-Ab negative at baseline compared to anti-CRP-Ab positive patients, p = 0.037. In the second year of therapy, baseline anti-CRP-Ab positivity was a significant predictor of "unfavorable outcome" (OR [95% CI] = 15.6 [1.2-771]; p = 0.021). The predictive value of "baseline anti-CRP positivity" further increased when combined with "non-response to therapy in the first year". Baseline anti-CRP-Ab positivity was not a predictor of "unfavorable outcome" at the end of follow-up, (OR [95% CI] = 5.5 [0.6-71.1], p = 0.169).

conclusionsBaseline serum levels of anti-CRP-Ab seem to be a strong risk factor for a composite outcome of non-response, renal flare or end stage renal disease after two years of standard treatment of LN. The response to therapy seems to be delayed in anti-CRP-Ab positive patients.

Indexed as

AdultAutoantibodiesAutoantigensBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLupus NephritisMalePrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexAutoantibodiesAutoantigensBiomarkersC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID26704903
PMCPMC4718018
OpenAlexW2204890656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.