Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704857›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2016

Redefining the Role of Limbic Areas in Cortical Processing.

Lorena Chanes, Lisa Feldman Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metacognitive Feelings: A Predictive-Processing Perspective.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorena ChanesNortheastern University, Department of Psychology, Boston, MA, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Lisa Feldman BarrettNortheastern University, Department of Psychology, Boston, MA, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA. Electronic address: l.barrett@neu.edu.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Social Decision Making in AgingR01AG030311 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, DICKERSON, BRADFORD C · 2006 to 2016
$5.6M
Does Reward Mediate Human Maternal Bonding? A PET-fMRI studyR21HD076164 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN · 2014 to 2015
$469k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030311NIA NIH HHS R01AG030311NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD076164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that the brain actively constructs action and perception using past experience. In this paper, we propose that the direction of information flow along gradients of laminar differentiation provides important insight on the role of limbic cortices in cortical processing. Cortical limbic areas, with a simple laminar structure (e.g., no or rudimentary layer IV), send 'feedback' projections to lower level better laminated areas. We propose that this 'feedback' functions as predictions that drive processing throughout the cerebral cortex. This hypothesis has the potential to provide a unifying framework for an increasing number of proposals that use predictive coding to explain a myriad of neural processes and disorders, and has important implications for hypotheses about consciousness.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexConsciousnessHumansLimbic SystemNeural PathwaysPerceptionactive inferenceconsciousnesscortical processingintrinsic networkslimbic corticespredictive codingstructural model

Identifiers

PMID26704857
PMCPMC4780414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.