Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704807›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Assessment of patient-specific instrumentation precision through bone resection measurements.

F Zambianchi, A Colombelli, V Digennaro, A Marcovigi, R Mugnai, F Fiacchi, D Sandoni, A Belluati, F Catani

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. High accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F ZambianchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy. francesco.zambianchi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-5692
A ColombelliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Azienda USL di Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy.
V DigennaroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
A MarcovigiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
R MugnaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
F FiacchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
D SandoniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
A BelluatiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Azienda USL di Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy.
F CataniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the present study, the precision of two patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was evaluated by comparing bony resection thicknesses of the pre-operative PSI planning and intra-operative measurements by a vernier calliper. It was hypothesized that the data provided by pre-operative planning were accurate within ±2 mm of the bone resection thickness measured intra-operatively.

methodsForty-one patient-specific TKAs were examined: 25 performed with Visionaire

resultsThe mean absolute differences between pre-operatively planned resections and corresponding intra-operative thickness measurements ranged from a minimum of 2.6 mm (SD 0.8) to a maximum of 3.6 mm (SD 1.3) in all three anatomical planes in both groups. In every plane, the mean absolute discrepancies between planned resections and measured cuts differed significantly from zero (p < 0.0001). The proportion of differences within ±2 mm between intra-operative measured resections and planned PSI cuts occurred in more than 90 % of the cohort for femoral distal resections. Less precision was reported for the femoral posterior medial cuts (70.7 % within ±2 mm) and the tibial cuts (70.7 % on the medial, 75.6 % on the lateral side). Prosthetic component alignment on the coronal and transverse planes resulted in considerable deviations from the pre-operative planning.

conclusionThe two examined PSI technologies were accurate in femoral distal cuts, determining acceptable femoral component placement on the coronal plane. Posterior femoral and tibial cuts were less precise. Deviations from the pre-operative resection planning were reported in every plane. Inaccuracy was explained by ambiguous custom-made jigs placement on the bony surface. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFemurHumansMaleSurgery, Computer-AssistedTibiaAccuracyBone resectionPSITKA

Identifiers

PMID26704807
OpenAlexW2307901710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.