Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704559›Full record

SynthesisZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2016

Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for large vessel vasculitis : A meta-analysis.

Y H Lee, S J Choi, J D Ji, G G Song

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Guideline
  2. F-18 FDG PET for assessment of disease activity of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Digital [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Innovations in Imaging:Current cardiology reports · 2024
    Review
  10. Usefulness ofArthritis research & therapy · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. New thresholds in semi-quantitative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Performance of Deauville Criteria inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Y H LeeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 136-705, Seoul, South Korea. lyhcgh@korea.ac.kr.
S J ChoiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 136-705, Seoul, South Korea.
J D JiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 136-705, Seoul, South Korea.
G G SongDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 136-705, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) or positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for patients with large vessel vasculitis.

methodsBased on a search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, a meta-analysis was performed on the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in patients with large vessel vasculitis.

resultsA total of eight studies involving 400 subjects (170 vasculitis patients and 230 controls) were selected for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT were 75.9 % (95 % confidence interval, CI 68.7-82.1) and 93.0 % (95 % CI 88.9-96.0), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 7.267 (95 % CI 3.707-14.24), 0.303 (95 % CI 0.229-0.400), and 32.04 (95 % CI 13.08-78.45), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.863 and the Q

conclusionThis meta-analysis of published studies demonstrates that 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT has good diagnostic accuracy for large vessel vasculitis and plays an important role in the diagnosis of this condition.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArteritisDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Giant cell arteritisImagingSensitivitySpecificityTakayasu arteritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.