Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704539›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2016

Osteogenic cell response to 3-D hydroxyapatite scaffolds developed via replication of natural marine sponges.

S A Clarke, S Y Choi, Melanie McKechnie, G Burke, N Dunne, G Walker, E Cunningham, F Buchanan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Research advances of fluid bio-mechanics in bone].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S A ClarkeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University of Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK. s.a.clarke@qub.ac.uk.
S Y ChoiSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast, Ashby Building, 121 Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK.
Melanie McKechnieSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University of Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.
G BurkeEngineering Research Institute, School of Engineering, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Shore Rd, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK.
N DunneSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast, Ashby Building, 121 Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK.
G WalkerSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast, Ashby Building, 121 Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK.
E CunninghamSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast, Ashby Building, 121 Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK.
F BuchananSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast, Ashby Building, 121 Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBDublin City University · IEUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering may provide an alternative to autograft, however scaffold optimisation is required to maximize bone ingrowth. In designing scaffolds, pore architecture is important and there is evidence that cells prefer a degree of non-uniformity. The aim of this study was to compare scaffolds derived from a natural porous marine sponge (Spongia agaricina) with unique architecture to those derived from a synthetic polyurethane foam. Hydroxyapatite scaffolds of 1 cm(3) were prepared via ceramic infiltration of a marine sponge and a polyurethane (PU) foam. Human foetal osteoblasts (hFOB) were seeded at 1 × 10(5) cells/scaffold for up to 14 days. Cytotoxicity, cell number, morphology and differentiation were investigated. PU-derived scaffolds had 84-91% porosity and 99.99% pore interconnectivity. In comparison marine sponge-derived scaffolds had 56-61% porosity and 99.9% pore interconnectivity. hFOB studies showed that a greater number of cells were found on marine sponge-derived scaffolds at than on the PU scaffold but there was no significant difference in cell differentiation. X-ray diffraction and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry showed that Si ions were released from the marine-derived scaffold. In summary, three dimensional porous constructs have been manufactured that support cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation but significantly more cells were seen on marine-derived scaffolds. This could be due both to the chemistry and pore architecture of the scaffolds with an additional biological stimulus from presence of Si ions. Further in vivo tests in orthotopic models are required but this marine-derived scaffold shows promise for applications in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomimetic MaterialsCells, CulturedDurapatiteGuinea PigsHumansMaterials TestingOsteoblastsOsteogenesisPoriferaTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatite

Identifiers

PMID26704539
PMCPMC4690835
OpenAlexW2267779209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.