Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704332›Full record

ArticleJournal of lower genital tract disease2016

Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands: Options and Opportunities.

Alan G Waxman, Lee E Buenconsejo-Lum, Miriam Cremer, Sarah Feldman, Kevin A Ault, Joanna M Cain, Maria Lina Diaz, Expert Panel on Cervical Cancer Screening in the US Territories Pacific Island Jurisdictions

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lower genital tract disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer Mortality in the US-Affiliated Pacific Islands, 2008-2013.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Alan G Waxman1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM; 2Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Pacific Regional Cancer Programs, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH; 4Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; 6Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA; and 7Molina Healthcare of Florida, Doral, FL.
Lee E Buenconsejo-Lum
Miriam Cremer
Sarah Feldman
Kevin A Ault
Joanna M Cain
Maria Lina Diaz
Expert Panel on Cervical Cancer Screening in the US Territories Pacific Island Jurisdictions
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USMolina Healthcare (United States)University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

USAPIN PACIFIC REGIONAL CENTRAL CANCER REGISTRYU58DP000835 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BUENCONSEJO-LUM, LEE ELLEN · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
USAPI PACIFIC REGIONAL CENTRAL CANCER REGISTRY (PRCCR)U58DP003906 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BUENCONSEJO-LUM, LEE ELLEN · 2012 to 2014
$1.6M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP000835NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuccessful cervical cancer screening in the United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) is limited by geographic, political, economic, and logistic factors. An expert panel convened to examine screening in each of the 6 island jurisdictions and to explore options beyond cytology-based screening. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-one representatives of American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, government agencies, the World Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization, health representatives of the 6 Pacific island jurisdictions, Puerto Rico, and several academic institutions met in a 2-day meeting to explore options to improve access and coverage of cervical cancer screening in the USAPI.

resultsCytology-based screening is less widely accessed and less successful in the USAPI than in the United States in general. Barriers include geographic isolation, cultural factors, and lack of resources. Cytology-based screening requires multiple visits to complete the process from screening to treatment. Screen-and-treat regimens based on visual inspection with acetic acid or human papillomavirus requiring 1 or 2 visits have the potential to improve cervical cancer prevention in the USAPI.

conclusionsThe standard US algorithm of cytology screening followed by colposcopy and treatment is less effective in geographically and culturally isolated regions such as the USAPI. Alternate technologies, both high tech, such as primary human papillomavirus screening, and low tech, such as visual inspection with acetic acid, have shown promise in resource-poor countries and may have applicability in these US jurisdictions.

Indexed as

Health Services AdministrationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPolynesiaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26704332
PMCPMC5672793
OpenAlexW2417593109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.