ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Surgical concepts in the treatment of Wilms tumor: An update].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting the prognosis of Wilms tumor by peripheral blood cells: a real-world study of more than 30 years.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- FOXO3a‑modulated DEPDC1 promotes malignant progression of nephroblastoma via the Wnt/β‑catenin signaling pathway.Molecular medicine reports · 2022Article
- Expression and clinical significance of p73 in Wilms tumor in children.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- [Innovations in surgical treatment of pediatric solid tumors].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Review
- Inhibitory effect of STAT3 gene combined with CDDP on growth of human Wilms tumour SK-NEP-1 cells.Bioscience reports · 2016Article
- Intracardiac Extension of Wilms Tumor: A Case of a 2.5-Year-Old Girl Presenting with Upper Venous Congestion Caused by Tumor Growth into the Right Cardiac Ventricle.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment results of Wilms tumors have been impressively improved over the past 50 years resulting in a stage-independent overall survival of greater than 90%. However, unsatisfying treatment results still remain in children with high-risk tumors and tumor relapses. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review highlights the current concepts of Wilms tumor surgery as a cornerstone of the treatment strategy for this malignancy. A selective literature review focusing on the past 5 years served as the basis for this article.
resultsNephron-sparing surgery is associated with an analogue outcome compared to tumor nephrectomy in unilateral Wilms tumors. The surgical panel of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) group has recently introduced a novel nomenclature for organ-preserving resection procedures in order to facilitate a prospective comparison of data. The minimally invasive approach represents an alternative technique with adequate outcome. In bilateral disease, nephron-sparing procedures are gold standard. Complete resection of lung and liver metastases has a significant impact on patients' survival.
conclusionsSurgical guidelines for nephron-sparing surgery and minimally invasive tumor nephrectomy need to be established and implemented within newly formulated treatment protocols of the different national and international treatment trials. Risk stratification of patients needs to be more individualized with the aim of reducing late effects while at least maintaining the same survival rates. The unsatisfying treatment results of tumor relapses-associated with low patient numbers within the different trials-emphasize the need for international collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.