Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704278›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015

[Systemic cancer treatment in geriatric patients].

J Hess

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J HessKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Uroonkologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. jochen.hess@uk-essen.de.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional health issues and the ability to autonomously participate in social life play a more pronounced role for geriatric patients than the mere prolongation of life. Quality-adjusted life years reflect the relation of health and life span. Comorbidities and functional or cognitive impairment represent independent predictors for the overall survival of geriatric patients. This must be kept in mind when planning systemic cancer treatment. THERAPY: All forms of cancer-specific therapy should evaluate whether the patient can truly benefit taking into consideration geriatric aspects. This particularly demands a great deal of palliative chemotherapy. When curation is no longer possible, a cancer-specific treatment must not lead to therapy-related symptoms. Clear communication of the aims of therapy is indispensable. In addition to routine urooncologic data, other relevant information must be inquired in advance of cancer-specific treatment in order to identify those functionally or cognitively impaired patients who may not benefit from systemic cancer treatment.

conclusionA precise indication with respect of age-dependent physiological changes and a clear prioritization of symptoms outline the approach for systemic cancer-specific treatment.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient SelectionQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsAndrogen deprivationChemotherapyDemografic changeImmunotherapyOncology

Identifiers

PMID26704278
OpenAlexW2343965051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.