Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26704070›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

Factors associated with utilization of emergency contraception among female students in Mizan-Tepi University, South West Ethiopia.

Bisrat Zeleke Shiferaw, Bosena Tebeje Gashaw, Fekadu Yadassa Tesso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bisrat Zeleke ShiferawDepartment of Midwifery, Wolkite University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, PO Box 07, Wolkite, Ethiopia. basfendaz@gmail.com.
Bosena Tebeje GashawDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Jimma University College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, PO Box 1355, Jimma, Ethiopia. bosenatebeje@yahoo.co.uk.
Fekadu Yadassa TessoDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Jimma University College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, PO Box 1355, Jimma, Ethiopia. fekaduyadassa@yahoo.com.
Jimma University · ETWolkite University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended pregnancy poses a major health problem on female students in higher educations. One of the key interventions to reduce unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion as outlined in the national youth strategy is making emergency contraception (EC) available for these risky population. However, despite its availability in many countries, EC has failed to have the desired impact on unintended pregnancy rates and its utilization is limited in colleges and universities. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with utilization of emergency contraception among female students in Mizan-Tepi University (MTU), south west Ethiopia.

methodsA cross-sectional, institution based study was conducted from March 10-30, 2014. Multistage sampling technique was used to select the participants for the quantitative method whereas; purposive and volunteer sampling techniques were used for the qualitative study. Quantitative data were cleaned, coded and entered into Epi-data 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 20:00. Binary and multiple logistic regression analysis were done to determine the association between the use of EC and the predicator variables. Data from focus group discussion were transcribed and translated to English then coded, and categorized into similar themes.

resultA total of 489 female students were participated in the quantitative study making a response rate of 90.6%. The finding shows that 46.3% of them have used EC following unprotected sex. Female students' knowledge about EC [AOR: 3.24; 95% CI 1.32, 7.98], age at first sexual intercourse (i.e. ≥20 years) [AOR: 4.04; 95% CI 1.72, 9.52], history of pregnancy [AOR: 3.12; 95% CI 1.34, 7.24] and previous use of regular contraceptives [AOR: 5.01; 95% CI 2.23, 11.27] were found to be significant predictors of EC utilization. In the focused group discussion, a total of 32 female students were participated and the result shows that lack of knowledge about EC and fear of being seen by others (information disclosure) were reported as main factors for not using EC.

conclusionThe study shows that the level of EC use was low. Female students' level of knowledge about EC, age at first sexual intercourse, previous use of regular contraceptives and history of pregnancy were major predictors of EC utilization. Therefore, designing strategies to enhance EC utilization by increasing female students' level of awareness on EC is recommended.

Indexed as

StudentsUniversitiesAdolescentAdultContraception, PostcoitalContraceptive Agents, FemaleCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLogistic ModelsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnsafe SexYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, Female

Identifiers

PMID26704070
PMCPMC4691018
OpenAlexW2239047474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.