Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26703790›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Reliability among clinicians diagnosing low back-related leg pain.

Siobhán Stynes, Kika Konstantinou, Kate M Dunn, Martyn Lewis, Elaine M Hay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siobhán StynesArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, UK. s.stynes@keele.ac.uk.
Kika KonstantinouArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, UK.
Kate M DunnArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, UK.
Martyn LewisArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, UK.
Elaine M HayArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, UK.
Keele University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CAT CDRF 10-055Department of Health CAT CL09-18Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate agreement and reliability among clinicians when diagnosing low back-related leg pain (LBLP) in primary care consulters.

methodsThirty-six patients were assessed by one of six physiotherapists and diagnosed as having either leg pain due to nerve root involvement (sciatica) or referred leg pain. Assessments were video recorded. In part one, the physiotherapists each viewed videos of six patients they had not assessed. In part two, videos were viewed by another six health professionals. All clinicians made an independent differential diagnosis and rated their confidence with diagnosis (range 50-100 %).

resultsIn part one agreement was 72 % with fair inter-rater reliability (K = 0.35, 95 % CI 0.07, 0.63). Results for part two were almost identical (K = 0.34, 95 % CI 0.02, 0.69). Agreement and reliability indices improved as diagnostic confidence increased.

conclusionReliability was fair among clinicians from different backgrounds when diagnosing LBLP but improved substantially with high confidence in clinical diagnosis.

Indexed as

PhysiciansAdultAgedFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSciaticaYoung AdultDifferential diagnosisLow back-related leg painReliabilitySciatica

Identifiers

PMID26703790
OpenAlexW2211505215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.