ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015
Application of Citizen Science Risk Communication Tools in a Vulnerable Urban Community.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Framework for Interfacing and Partnering with Environmental Justice Communities as a Prelude to Human Health and Hazard Identification in the Vulnerable Census Tracts of Columbus, Ohio.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Health Equity.Annual review of public health · 2022Review
- Shared Purpose: Leveraging a Community-Academic Partnership to Increase Local Environmental Health Awareness via Community Science.Journal of participatory research methods · 2022Article
- Defining the Exposome Using Popular Education and Concept Mapping With Communities in Atlanta, Georgia.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Rethinking of Environmental Health Risks: A Systematic Approach of Physical-Social Health Vulnerability Assessment on Heavy-Metal Exposure through Soil and Vegetables.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Participatory Research for Environmental Justice: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.Environmental health perspectives · 2021Review
- The Health Opportunity Index: Understanding the Input to Disparate Health Outcomes in Vulnerable and High-Risk Census Tracts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for Asia.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2020Review
- A Scoping Review of Capacity-Building Efforts to Address Environmental Justice Concerns.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects.JAMIA open · 2020Article
- Use of an Exposome Approach to Understand the Effects of Exposures From the Natural, Built, and Social Environments on Cardio-Vascular Disease Onset, Progression, and Outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2020Review
- Application of the Public Health Exposome Framework to Estimate Phenotypes of Resilience in a Model Ohio African-American Women's Cohort.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2019Article
- Utilization of the Maryland Environmental Justice Screening Tool: A Bladensburg, Maryland Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- An Interactive Model among Potential Human Risk Factors: 331 Cases of Coal Mine Roof Accidents in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Advice and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Citizen-Science Environmental Health Assessments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- A Scoping Review and Assessment of the Area-Level Composite Measures That Estimate Social Determinants of Health Across the United States.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A public participatory geographical information systems (PPGIS) demographic, environmental, socioeconomic, health status portal was developed for the Stambaugh-Elwood (SE) community in Columbus, OH. We hypothesized that soil at SE residences would have metal concentrations above natural background levels. Three aims were developed that allowed testing of this hypothesis. Aim 1 focused on establishing partnerships between academia, state agencies and communities to assist in the development of a community voice. Aim 2 was to design and conduct soil sampling for residents of the SE community. Aim 3 was to utilize our interactive, customized portal as a risk communication tool by allowing residents to educate themselves as to the potential risks from industrial sources in close proximity to their community. Multiple comparisons of means were used to determine differences in soil element concentration by sampling location at p < 0.05. The results demonstrated that eight metals (As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Mo, Se, Tl, Zn) occurred at statistically-significantly greater levels than natural background levels, but most were below risk-based residential soil screening levels. Results were conveyed to residents via an educational, risk-communication informational card. This study demonstrates that community-led coalitions in collaboration with academic teams and state agencies can effectively address environmental concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.