ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2016
A report of three cases of exophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor detected by transabdominal ultrasound.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic Resection of Incidentally Detected Early-Stage Synchronous Duodenal and Jejunal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Ultrasound radiomics model-based nomogram for predicting the risk Stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Natural History of Exophytic Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report.Yonago acta medica · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common submucosal tumors of the stomach. GISTs are often detected by esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy (EGD). However, the exophytic GIST type is relatively rare and difficult to detect by EGD. Most exophytic GISTs found are large and symptomatic. We present three cases with exophytic GISTs less than 5 cm in diameter detected by transabdominal ultrasound (TUS). All patients were asymptomatic and TUS revealed hypoechoic solid masses 2-3 cm in diameter between the stomach and left lobe of the liver. In contrast, no tumor in the stomach was detected by esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy. Endoscopic ultrasound and enhanced CT showed gastric tumors protruding outward. All three cases underwent partial gastrectomy, and the excised tumor was diagnosed as low-grade GIST. In conclusion, TUS can be a starting point for diagnosing exophytic GISTs of the stomach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.