ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2016
Vertebral artery Doppler waveform patterns for exclusive diagnosis of basilar artery stenosis and occlusion.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging Characteristics of Persistent Carotid-Vertebrobasilar Anastomoses Detected by Ultrasound: A Case Series.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia in Chinese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of vertebral artery (VA) pulsed Doppler waveform changes in excluding basilar artery (BA) stenosis/occlusion.
methodsOne-hundred and twenty-two patients with time-averaged peak flow velocity (MV) of bilateral VAs <18 cm/s, measured by carotid ultrasonography, were included. The pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI) of both VAs were measured. The maximum PI (Max PI) and maximum RI (Max RI) were used for analysis, respectively. BA stenosis/occlusion and fetal-type posterior cerebral artery (f-PCA) were evaluated using MR angiography.
resultsThirty-six patients had BA stenosis/occlusion. Acute infratentorial cerebral infarction (CI), f-PCA, Max PI, and Max RI were significantly higher in patients with BA stenosis/occlusion. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that "Max PI ≥2.00 or Max RI ≥0.82" had an odds ratio of 3.75 (95% CI 1.43-9.84) for diagnosing BA stenosis/occlusion, but the positive predictive value (PPV) was low (42.2%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was high (84.5%). Similarly, "Max PI ≥2.00 and Max RI ≥0.82" had an odds ratio of 2.96 (95% CI 1.18-7.39); PPV was low (44.9%) and NPV was high (80.8%).
conclusionAmong the subjects with bilateral VA-MV <18 cm/s, PI and RI could contribute to excluding BA stenosis/occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.