Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26703089›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2016

Learning history and cholinergic modulation in the dorsal hippocampus are necessary for rats to infer the status of a hidden event.

Cynthia D Fast, M Melissa Flesher, Nathanial A Nocera, Michael S Fanselow, Aaron P Blaisdell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The conjunction fallacy in rats.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cynthia D FastDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
M Melissa FlesherDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Nathanial A NoceraDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Michael S FanselowDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Aaron P BlaisdellDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Contextual Fear Differentiation, Sex Differences and AcetylcholineR01MH062122 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FANSELOW, MICHAEL S · 2001 to 2021
$7.3M
PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSCIENCET32DA018926 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Nace L Golding, AMY LEE · 2004 to 2026
$5.6M
Neural mechanisms mediating inferential reasoning abilities in ratsR36AG045410 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FAST, CYNTHIA DIANE · 2013 to 2013
$40k
NIA NIH HHS R36 AG045410NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA018926NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying statistical patterns between environmental stimuli enables organisms to respond adaptively when cues are later observed. However, stimuli are often obscured from detection, necessitating behavior under conditions of ambiguity. Considerable evidence indicates decisions under ambiguity rely on inference processes that draw on past experiences to generate predictions under novel conditions. Despite the high demand for this process and the observation that it deteriorates disproportionately with age, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We developed a rodent model of decision-making during ambiguity to examine features of experience that contribute to inference. Rats learned either a simple (positive patterning) or complex (negative patterning) instrumental discrimination between the illumination of one or two lights. During test, only one light was lit while the other relevant light was blocked from physical detection (covered by an opaque shield, rendering its status ambiguous). We found experience with the complex negative patterning discrimination was necessary for rats to behave sensitively to the ambiguous test situation. These rats behaved as if they inferred the presence of the hidden light, responding differently than when the light was explicitly absent (uncovered and unlit). Differential expression profiles of the immediate early gene cFos indicated hippocampal involvement in the inference process while localized microinfusions of the muscarinic antagonist, scopolamine, into the dorsal hippocampus caused rats to behave as if only one light was present. That is, blocking cholinergic modulation prevented the rat from inferring the presence of the hidden light. Collectively, these results suggest cholinergic modulation mediates recruitment of hippocampal processes related to past experiences and transfer of these processes to make decisions during ambiguous situations. Our results correspond with correlations observed between human brain function and inference abilities, suggesting our experiments may inform interventions to alleviate or prevent cognitive dysfunction. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsCatheters, IndwellingDecision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHippocampusImmunohistochemistryLearningMuscarinic AntagonistsNeuropsychological TestsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRats, Long-EvansScopolamineVisual PerceptionAcetylcholineMuscarinic AntagonistsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosScopolamineacetylcholineinferencenegative patterningpositive patterningrepresentationstimulus ambiguity

Identifiers

PMID26703089
PMCPMC4866895
OpenAlexW2204982108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.