Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26702218›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Acute pain services in India: A glimpse of the current scenario.

Parmanand N Jain, Sumitra G Bakshi, Raghu S Thota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Oligoanalgesia in the emergency setting - An Indian review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute pain service: Round the clock vigilance.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parmanand N JainDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sumitra G BakshiDepartment of Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Raghu S ThotaDepartment of Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAcute postoperative pain is still a neglected and unresolved issue in day to day practice. Acute pain services were conceived three decades ago to form a dedicated team to monitor pain assessment and treatment as per laid down pain protocols and guidelines. The concept of acute pain service (APS) is slowly evolving in India. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted to identify the status of postoperative pain, the prevalent treatment practices, and the prevalence of acute pain services in India. An electronic communication was sent to 4000 Indian Society of Anesthesiologists life members.

resultsWe received only 146 responses mainly from faculties/consultants from few corporate hospitals or medical colleges. About 68 APSs were functioning, however, 20 APS do not have any training programs and 34 have no written protocols. Anesthesiologists were involved in postoperative pain management only when epidural analgesia was employed.

conclusionThis survey found that majority of anesthesiologists agree to establish an APS, however administrative issues seem to be a major barrier.

Indexed as

Acute pain servicepain in Indiapost-operative painquestionnaire survey

Identifiers

PMID26702218
PMCPMC4676250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.