Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26702129›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2016

Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Dominik Duscher, David Atashroo, Zeshaan N Maan, Anna Luan, Elizabeth A Brett, Janos Barrera, Sacha M Khong, Elizabeth R Zielins, Alexander J Whittam, Michael S Hu and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Facial Rejuvenation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. [Current status and prospects of clinical application of liposuction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Autologous fat grafting: Harvesting techniques.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominik DuscherHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA Section of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
David AtashrooHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Zeshaan N MaanHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Anna LuanHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Elizabeth A BrettHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Janos BarreraHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Sacha M KhongHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Elizabeth R ZielinsHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Alexander J WhittamHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael S HuHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Graham G WalmsleyHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael S PollhammerSection of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Manfred SchmidtSection of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Arndt F SchillingDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hans-Günther MachensDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg M HuemerSection of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Derrick C WanHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael T LongakerHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Geoffrey C GurtnerHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA ggurtner@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Reversal of Progenitor Cell Deficits in DiabetesR01DK074095 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C · 2005 to 2025
$6.4M
Targeting HIF-1 alpha Dysfunction in Complications of AgingR01AG025016 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C · 2004 to 2015
$3.5M
Osteogenic Enrichment of Adipose Derived Stromal CellsR01DE021683 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C, LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025016NIA NIH HHS R01-AG025016NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021683NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074095NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK074095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat tissue and the ease of harvest via liposuction. However, little is known about the impact of different liposuction methods on the functionality of ASCs. Here we evaluate the regenerative abilities of ASCs harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL). Lipoaspirates were sorted using fluorescent assisted cell sorting based on an established surface-marker profile (CD34+/CD31-/CD45-), to obtain viable ASCs. Yield and viability were compared and the differentiation capacities of the ASCs were assessed. Finally, the regenerative potential of ASCs was examined using an in vivo model of tissue regeneration. UAL- and SAL-derived samples demonstrated equivalent ASC yield and viability, and UAL ASCs were not impaired in their osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Equally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed comparable expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes between both ASC groups. Cutaneous regeneration and neovascularization were significantly enhanced in mice treated with ASCs obtained by either UAL or SAL compared with controls, but there were no significant differences in healing between cell-therapy groups. We conclude that UAL is a successful method of obtaining fully functional ASCs for regenerative medicine purposes. Cells harvested with this alternative approach to liposuction are suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications. Significance: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are an appealing source of therapeutic progenitor cells because of their multipotency, diverse cytokine profile, and ease of harvest via liposuction. Alternative approaches to classical suction-assisted liposuction are gaining popularity; however, little evidence exists regarding the impact of different liposuction methods on the regenerative functionality of ASCs. Human ASC characteristics and regenerative capacity were assessed when harvested via ultrasound-assisted (UAL) versus standard suction-assisted liposuction. ASCs obtained via UAL were of equal quality when directly compared with the current gold standard harvest method. UAL is an adjunctive source of fully functional mesenchymal stem cells for applications in basic research and clinical therapy.

Indexed as

Abdominal FatAdipocytesAdultAnimalsAntigens, CDBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalChondrocytesElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleFlow CytometryHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLipectomyMaleAntigens, CDBiomarkersIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsAdipogenesisAdipose-derived stem cellsAdult mesenchymal stem cellsCell therapyFat harvestRegenerative medicineUltrasound-assisted liposuction

Identifiers

PMID26702129
PMCPMC4729547
OpenAlexW2236433435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.