Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26702082›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015

Temporal Trends and Hospital Variation in Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use in Veterans Discharged With Heart Failure.

Sandesh Dev, Mary E Lacy, Frederick A Masoudi, Wen-Chih Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Hyperkalaemia in Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sandesh DevPhoenix VA Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (S.D.).
Mary E LacyBrown University, Providence, RI (M.E.L., W.C.W.) Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI (M.E.L., W.C.W.).
Frederick A MasoudiUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (F.A.M.).
Wen-Chih WuBrown University, Providence, RI (M.E.L., W.C.W.) Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI (M.E.L., W.C.W.).
Brown University · USPhoenix VA Health Care System · USProvidence VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Effect of sickle cell trait status on diabetes prediction in African AmericansF31DK105791 · NIDDK · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LACY, MARY E. · 2015 to 2016
$87k
NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK105791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite concerns about mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapies (MRAs) underuse and misuse in patients with heart failure, temporal and institutional variations of MRA prescription have not been reported. METHODS AND

resultsWe studied a national sample of veterans hospitalized for heart failure between 2003 and 2009 and left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. We identified ideal and non-ideal candidates for MRA therapy based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. We measured temporal trends and hospital variation of MRA prescriptions within 90 days after discharge. We determined the median odds ratio (MOR), a measure of the relative odds of an MRA prescription for 2 individuals with similar characteristics discharged at 2 randomly selected hospitals. From 37 126 patients (n=131 hospitals), 9355 were ideal-MRA candidates, and 4056 were non-ideal candidates. Among ideal candidates, 36% received an MRA, but there was a decline in use (41% in 2003 to 31% in 2009, P<0.001). Of non-ideal candidates, 27% received an MRA with a decline in use (34% in 2003 to 22% in 2009, P<0.001). Hospital MRA prescription ranged from 0% to 71% for ideal candidates and 0% to 100% for non-ideal candidates. The median odds ratios of MRA prescription for ideal and non-ideal candidates were 1.44 and 1.36, respectively; a median odds ratio >1.2 indicates significant practice-level variation.

conclusionsThere was decreasing MRA use between 2003 and 2009 with wide institutional variation in MRA prescription, which suggests opportunities for improvement to stimulate MRA use in ideal candidates while further reducing use in those with contraindications.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHospitals, VeteransHumansMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsPatient DischargePractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesVeteransMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonistsappropriateness criteriaquality of carespironolactonevariation

Identifiers

PMID26702082
PMCPMC4845296
OpenAlexW2258689583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.