Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701883›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2015

New scaling relation for information transfer in biological networks.

Hyunju Kim, Paul Davies, Sara Imari Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Informational architecture across non-living and living collectives.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How causal analysis can reveal autonomy in models of biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  6. Re-conceptualizing the origins of life.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyunju KimBEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Paul DaviesBEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Sara Imari WalkerBEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA ASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA, USA sara.i.walker@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · USBlue Marble Space · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We quantify characteristics of the informational architecture of two representative biological networks: the Boolean network model for the cell-cycle regulatory network of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Davidich et al. 2008 PLoS ONE 3, e1672 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001672)) and that of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Li et al. 2004 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4781-4786 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0305937101)). We compare our results for these biological networks with the same analysis performed on ensembles of two different types of random networks: Erdös-Rényi and scale-free. We show that both biological networks share features in common that are not shared by either random network ensemble. In particular, the biological networks in our study process more information than the random networks on average. Both biological networks also exhibit a scaling relation in information transferred between nodes that distinguishes them from random, where the biological networks stand out as distinct even when compared with random networks that share important topological properties, such as degree distribution, with the biological network. We show that the most biologically distinct regime of this scaling relation is associated with a subset of control nodes that regulate the dynamics and function of each respective biological network. Information processing in biological networks is therefore interpreted as an emergent property of topology (causal structure) and dynamics (function). Our results demonstrate quantitatively how the informational architecture of biologically evolved networks can distinguish them from other classes of network architecture that do not share the same informational properties.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSchizosaccharomycesbiological functionbiological networksinformation transferorigin of lifeyeast cell cycle

Identifiers

PMID26701883
PMCPMC4707865
OpenAlexW1510691065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.