Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701703›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Abdominal insufflation for laparoscopy increases intracranial and intrathoracic pressure in human subjects.

Tovy Haber Kamine, Nassrene Y Elmadhun, Ekkehard M Kasper, Efstathios Papavassiliou, Benjamin E Schneider

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopically assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting: a minimal invasive technique.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tovy Haber KamineDepartment of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Shapiro 3, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Nassrene Y ElmadhunDepartment of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Shapiro 3, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Ekkehard M KasperDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Efstathios PapavassiliouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin E SchneiderDepartment of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Shapiro 3, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. beschnei@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopy has emerged as an alternative to laparotomy in select trauma patients. In animal models, increasing abdominal pressure is associated with an increase in intrathoracic and intracranial pressures. We conducted a prospective trial of human subjects who underwent laparoscopic-assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement (lap VPS) with intraoperative measurement of intrathoracic, intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures.

methodsTen patients undergoing lap VPS were recruited. Abdominal insufflation was performed using CO2 to 0, 8, 10, 12 and 15 mmHg. ICP was measured through the ventricular catheter simultaneously with insufflation and with desufflation using a manometer. Peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) were measured through the endotracheal tube. Blood pressure was measured using a noninvasive blood pressure cuff. End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) was measured for each set of abdominal pressure level. Pressure measurements from all points of insufflation were compared using a two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Bonferroni test. Mean changes in pressures were compared using t test.

resultsICP and PIP increased significantly with increasing abdominal pressure (both p < 0.01), whereas cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and mean arterial pressure did not significantly change with increasing abdominal pressure over the range tested. Higher abdominal pressure values were associated with decreased ETCO2 values.

conclusionIncreased ICP and PIP appear to be a direct result of increasing abdominal pressure, since ETCO2 did not increase. Though CPP did not change over the range tested, the ICP in some patients with 15 mmHg abdominal insufflation reached values as high as 32 cmH2O, which is considered above tolerance, regardless of the CPP. Laparoscopy should be used cautiously, in patients who present with baseline elevated ICP or head trauma as abdominal insufflation affects intracranial pressure.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPressureAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInhalationIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialProspective StudiesThoracic CavityVentriculoperitoneal ShuntIntracranial pressureIntrathoracic pressureLaparoscopyVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID26701703
OpenAlexW2212846787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.