Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701666›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2016

Advances in and Algorithms for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Jens Ingwersen, Orhan Aktas, Hans-Peter Hartung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cell-based therapeutic strategies for multiple sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jens IngwersenDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Orhan AktasDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment options in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have increased considerably in recent years; currently, a dozen different preparations of disease-modifying therapies are available and some more are expected to be marketed soon. For the treating neurologist this broad therapeutic repertoire not only greatly improves individualized management of the disease, but also makes choices more complex and difficult. A number of factors must be considered, including disease activity and severity, safety profile, and patient preference. We here discuss the currently existing options and suggest treatment algorithms for managing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

AlemtuzumabAlgorithmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCrotonatesDimethyl FumarateFingolimod HydrochlorideGlatiramer AcetateHumansHydroxybutyratesInterferon-betaMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNatalizumabNitrilesToluidinesAlemtuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCrotonatesDimethyl FumarateFingolimod HydrochlorideGlatiramer AcetateHydroxybutyratesInterferon-betaNatalizumabNitrilesteriflunomideToluidinesDisease-modifying therapyRelapsing-remitting multiple sclerosisTreatment algorithmTreatment decisions

Identifiers

PMID26701666
PMCPMC4720679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.