Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701641›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Missed opportunities to deliver intermittent preventive treatment for malaria to pregnant women 2003-2013: a systematic analysis of 58 household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa.

Kathryn G Andrews, Michael Lynch, Erin Eckert, Julie Gutman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathryn G AndrewsHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. kathryn.andrews@mail.harvard.edu.
Michael LynchMalaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. mlynch@cdc.gov.
Erin EckertPresident's Malaria Initiative, USAID, Washington, DC, USA. eeckert@usaid.gov.
Julie GutmanMalaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. fff2@cdc.gov.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the availability of effective preventive measures, including intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy (IPTp), malaria continues to cause substantial disease burden among pregnant women in malaria-endemic areas. IPTp coverage remains low, despite high antenatal care (ANC) attendance. To highlight areas of potential improvement, trends in IPTp coverage were assessed over time, missed opportunities to deliver IPTp at ANC were quantified, and delivery of IPTp was compared to that of tetanus toxoid (TT).

methodsData from 58 Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2003 and 2013 in 31 sub-Saharan African countries, with relevant questions on IPTp, ANC and TT were used to assess ANC attendance, and IPTp and TT delivery. A missed opportunity for IPTp delivery is an ANC visit at which IPTp could have been delivered according to policy but was not.

resultsThe proportion of pregnant women who received ≥2 doses of IPTp increased in surveyed countries from nearly zero before to a median of 29.6% (IQR 20.1-42.5%) seven or more years after IPTp policy adoption. ANC attendance was high (median 76.6% reported ≥3 visits); however, even seven or more years post policy adoption, a median of 72.9% (IQR 58.4-79.5%) ANC visits were missed opportunities to deliver IPTp. Among primigravid women, a median of 61.5% (IQR 50.9-72.9%) received two doses of TT; delivery of recommended TT exceeded IPTp in all but one surveyed country.

conclusionsIPTp coverage measured by household surveys is unsatisfactorily low, even many years after policy adoption. The many missed opportunities to deliver IPTp suggest that deficiencies in delivery at ANC are a significant contributing factor to the low coverage levels. High levels of TT delivery indicate capacity to deliver preventive measures at ANC. Further research is required to determine the factors driving the discrepancies between IPTp and TT coverage, and how these may be addressed to improve IPTp coverage.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAfrica South of the SaharaAntimalarialsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMalariaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSurveys and QuestionnairesAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID26701641
PMCPMC4690242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.