Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701357›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2016

Reduced Silent Occlusions with a Novel Catheter Infusion Set (BD FlowSmart): Results from Two Open-Label Comparative Studies.

Michael Gibney, Zhenyi Xue, Monica Swinney, Damian Bialonczyk, Laurence Hirsch

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Occlusion Detection Time in Insulin Pumps at Two Different Basal Rates.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael Gibney1 Diabetes Care, BD Medical Affairs, Becton Dickinson and Company , Franklin Lakes, New Jersey.
Zhenyi Xue2 Office of Science, Medicine and Technology, BD Corporate Clinical Development, Becton Dickinson and Company , Sparks, Maryland.
Monica Swinney3 Diabetes Care, BD Research & Development, Becton Dickinson and Company , Andover, Massachusetts.
Damian Bialonczyk1 Diabetes Care, BD Medical Affairs, Becton Dickinson and Company , Franklin Lakes, New Jersey.
Laurence Hirsch1 Diabetes Care, BD Medical Affairs, Becton Dickinson and Company , Franklin Lakes, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsulin pump users experience periods of unexplained hyperglycemia. In some cases these may be due to insulin flow interruptions termed "silent occlusions," which occur without activating the pump alarm and may require set replacement. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn-line pressure profiles of a novel infusion set with a 6-mm, 28-gauge polymer, dual-ported catheter (BD FlowSmart™; Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ) were compared with those of an existing infusion set (Quick-set®; Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) in two separate studies involving insulin diluent infusions over 2.5-4.5-h periods in healthy adults without diabetes. Study 1, a pilot study (n = 25), compared the occurrence of flow interruption events (silent occlusions and/or occlusion alarms) between the two infusion sets and between manual or device-assisted insertion methods. Study 2 (n = 60) was designed to show ≥50% reduction in flow interruption events with the BD set after manual insertions. (Silent occlusions were defined by a continuous pressure rise for ≥30 min.)

resultsIn Study 1, significantly fewer silent occlusions were seen with BD FlowSmart versus Quick-set infusion sets for both manual (three of 22 [13.6%] vs. 12 of 24 [50%]; P = 0.012) and mechanical (two of 24 [8.3%] vs. nine of 25 [36%]; P = 0.037) insertions, yielding risk reductions of 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25-91%) and 77% (95% CI, 17-94%), respectively. In Study 2, flow interruption events occurred in three of 117 (2.6%) and 12 of 118 (10.2%) BD FlowSmart and Quick-set infusion sets, respectively, yielding a 75% risk reduction (95% CI, 20-92%; P = 0.030). Percentage of time with flow interruption was significantly lower with BD sets in both studies (P < 0.02). Leakage (>0.5 IU or 5 μL) occurred infrequently and did not differ between sets.

conclusionsA novel side-ported insulin infusion set demonstrated significant reductions in flow interruptions, including silent occlusions, versus a leading marketed set, which may improve insulin delivery.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignAdolescentAdultAgedCatheterizationCatheter ObstructionCatheters, IndwellingEquipment FailureFemaleHumansInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleMaterials TestingMiddle AgedNew JerseyPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID26701357
PMCPMC4790215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.