Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701150›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2016

TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis.

Irene Gallina, Signe Korbo Christiansen, Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen, Michael Lisby, Vibe H Oestergaard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pre-rRNA Facilitates TopBP1-Mediated DNA Double-Strand Break Response.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rescue from replication stress during mitosis.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irene Gallinaa Department of Biology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen N , Denmark.
Signe Korbo Christiansena Department of Biology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen N , Denmark.
Rune Troelsgaard Pedersena Department of Biology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen N , Denmark.
Michael Lisbya Department of Biology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen N , Denmark.
Vibe H Oestergaarda Department of Biology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen N , Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of genome integrity is crucial to avoid cancer and other genetic diseases. Thus faced with DNA damage, cells mount a DNA damage response to avoid genome instability. The DNA damage response is partially inhibited during mitosis presumably to avoid erroneous processing of the segregating chromosomes. Yet our recent study shows that TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis is highly important to reduce transmission of DNA damage to daughter cells. (1) Here we provide an overview of the DNA damage response and DNA repair during mitosis. One role of TopBP1 during mitosis is to stimulate unscheduled DNA synthesis at underreplicated regions. We speculated that such genomic regions are likely to hold stalled replication forks or post-replicative gaps, which become the substrate for DNA synthesis upon entry into mitosis. Thus, we addressed whether the translesion pathways for fork restart or post-replicative gap filling are required for unscheduled DNA synthesis in mitosis. Using genetics in the avian DT40 cell line, we provide evidence that unscheduled DNA synthesis in mitosis does not require the translesion synthesis scaffold factor Rev1 or PCNA ubiquitylation at K164, which serve to recruit translesion polymerases to stalled forks. In line with this finding, translesion polymerase η foci do not colocalize with TopBP1 or FANCD2 in mitosis. Taken together, we conclude that TopBP1 promotes unscheduled DNA synthesis in mitosis independently of the examined translesion polymerases.

Indexed as

DNA RepairDNA ReplicationMitosisAnimalsB-LymphocytesCarrier ProteinsCell LineChickensDNADNA DamageDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinNucleotidyltransferasesProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenUbiquitinationY-Family DNA PolymerasesCarrier ProteinsDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinNucleotidyltransferasesProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRad30 proteinY-Family DNA Polymerasesfork restartmitosisPCNA ubiquitylationpolymerase ηpost-replicative gapsreplication stressREV1TopBP1translesion synthesis

Identifiers

PMID26701150
PMCPMC4825820
OpenAlexW2286540398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.