Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26701098›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2015

Ethnobotanical survey of plants used in Afyonkarahisar-Turkey.

Süleyman Arı, Mehmet Temel, Mustafa Kargıoğlu, Muhsin Konuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The first bioactivity studies ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Plant leaves for wrapping zongzi in China: an ethnobotanical study.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Wild edible plants in Yeşilli (Mardin-Turkey), a multicultural area.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Süleyman ArıDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science & Arts Faculty, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. slymanari@hotmail.com.
Mehmet TemelDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science & Arts Faculty, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. mtemel@aku.edu.tr.
Mustafa KargıoğluDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science & Arts Faculty, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. kargi@aku.edu.tr.
Muhsin KonukDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Üsküdar University, 34662, Istanbul, Turkey. mkonuk@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traditional knowledge about plants and their uses in Turkey is disappearing in recent years because the new generations of villagers migrate to big cities for a better life. Afyonkarahisar located at the intersection of roads and phytogeographical regions (Mediterranean, Iran-Turan, and Euro-Siberian) has more than 2500 plant species. This richness of plant diversity promotes the indigenous commuity for the traditional use of wild plants. The aim of the study is to show wild plants' ethnobotanical usages associated with medicinal, food, fodder, and household goods in 31 settlements within the boundaries of Afyonkarahisar province.

methodsThe ethnobotanical data were collected from 46 informants by means of semi-structured interviews from 2012 to 2014. Ethnobotanical uses of plants of the study area were conducted in the vicinity of Afyonkarahisar (5 districts, 8 towns, 15 villages, and 3 neighborhood centers).

resultsOne hundred and thirty plant taxa belonging to 39 families were recorded and collected. Hundred and seventy-eight different uses of these plants were documented and used generally for medicinal (84), food (68), fodder (16), household goods (3), dyes (3), handicrafts (3) and religious (1).

conclusionThis study provides interesting uses of plants in the local community of Afyonkarahisar and its surrounding area, in what purpose they make use of plants, how they make use of them and obtained results will contribute to economy of villagers. Since the local people, especially in villages, are poor and do not have health care, they use the plants to treat illnesses, food, fodder, household goods and other uses (evil eye). Also this study will light the way for posterity for next generations.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyPlants, EdiblePlants, MedicinalSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkey

Identifiers

PMID26701098
PMCPMC4690277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.