ArticleAmerican journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities2016
Performance on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2 by Children With Williams Syndrome.
Article in American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Neural Substrates of Number Sense: A Perspective on Genetics, Behaviour and Neural Circuity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mapping brain function underlying naturalistic motor observation and imitation using high-density diffuse optical tomography.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Diseases in Public Health: Chromosomal Abnormalities in Congenital Heart Disease Causing Sudden Cardiac Death in Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Neuropsychological Assessment of the Relationship of Working Memory with K-BIT Matrices and Vocabulary in Normal Development and ADHD Children and Adolescents.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Rhythm and timing as vulnerabilities in neurodevelopmental disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- A cross-comparison of cognitive ability across 8 genomic disorders.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021Review
- Multiple bladder diverticula with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a case report.Translational pediatrics · 2020Article
- Impaired behavioral and neural representation of scenes in Williams syndrome.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- Investigating the Association Between Exposure to Second Hand SmokeFrontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Predictors of specific phobia in children with Williams syndrome.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2016Article
- Children with Williams syndrome: Developmental trajectories for intellectual abilities, vocabulary abilities, and adaptive behavior.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe the performance of 292 4- to 17-year-olds with Williams syndrome (WS) on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2 (KBIT-2; Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004). Mean IQ Composite, Verbal standard score (SS), and Nonverbal SS were in the borderline range relative to the general population, with variability similar to the general population. Correlations between SSs and CA were close to 0, with no significant sex differences. There was a significant effect of maternal education on Verbal SS. The KBIT-2 appropriately captures the full range of performance of 8- to 17-year-olds with WS for the abilities measured and of all but the very lowest-functioning 5- to 7-year-olds. However, the KBIT-2 does not contain easy enough items to adequately assess the abilities of the lowest quartile of 4-year-olds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.