Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700825›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2016

Endovascular treatment of intracranial infectious aneurysms.

Asim Esenkaya, Fatih Duzgun, Celal Cinar, Halil Bozkaya, Cenk Eraslan, Erkin Ozgiray, Ismail Oran

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Management of infectious intracranial aneurysms in the pediatric population.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Asim EsenkayaTrakya University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, 22030, Edirne, Turkey. asimesenkaya@hotmail.com.
Fatih DuzgunCelal Bayar University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Manisa, Turkey.
Celal CinarEge University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Izmir, Turkey.
Halil BozkayaEge University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Izmir, Turkey.
Cenk EraslanEge University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroadiology, Izmir, Turkey.
Erkin OzgirayEge University Medical Faculty, Department of Neurosurgery, Izmir, Turkey.
Ismail OranEge University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Izmir, Turkey.
Ege University · TRManisa Celal Bayar University · TRTrakya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntracranial infectious aneurysm (IIA) accounts for less than 5% of all intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endovascular treatment for IIA.

methodsDuring a 14-year period, 15 patients (age range, 2-68 years; mean, 42.8 years) with 17 aneurysms were diagnosed with IIA and treated via an endovascular route at our institution. The IIA diagnosis was based on clinical and laboratory findings of infection, echocardiography results, and digital subtraction angiography that were collected retrospectively. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed. The modified Rankin scale was used to evaluate clinical outcome.

resultsAmong 15 patients, 12 presented with ruptured aneurysms (7 intraparenchymal hematoma, 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage, 1 subdural hematoma), 2 with cerebral infarcts, and 1 with pansinusitis and epidural abscess. All but one aneurysm were distally located in intracranial circulation, 14 were in anterior, and the remaining 3 were in posterior circulation. The final diagnosis was based on aneurysm morphology, location, and clinical laboratory findings. Endovascular treatment was scheduled initially for all IIAs; 13 of 17 IIAs underwent endovascular parent vessel occlusion, 3 underwent spontaneous parent vessel occlusion while waiting for intervention, and the remaining patient was treated by intrasaccular coil occlusion. There were no instances of perioperative neurological complications. Late clinical and radiological outcomes included absence of endovascular treatment related to mortality and aneurysm recurrence.

conclusionEndovascular treatment may be performed safely at the time of diagnosis for at least symptomatic IIAs under the protective effect of antibiotic treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAneurysm, InfectedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCerebral AngiographyChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresHemostaticsHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsHemostaticsEndovascular treatmentIntracranial infectious aneurysmIntracranial mycotic aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID26700825
OpenAlexW2201126348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.