Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700824›Full record

ReviewNeuroradiology2016

Punctate and curvilinear gadolinium enhancing lesions in the brain: a practical approach.

Guillaume Taieb, Alberto Duran-Peña, Nicolas Menjot de Chamfleur, Antoine Moulignier, Eric Thouvenot, Thibaut Allou, Arnaud Lacour, Khe Hoang-Xuan, Jean Pelletier, Pierre Labauge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Erdheim-Chester Disease Masquerading as CLIPPERS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cerebral enhancement in MOG antibody-associated disease.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CD8BMC neurology · 2020
    Article
  14. Brain miliary enhancement.Neuroradiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CLIPPERS.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  20. Therapeutic Approaches in CLIPPERS.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume TaiebDepartment of Neurology, CHU Montpellier, Hopital Guy de Chauliac, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. taiebguillaume@gmail.com.
Alberto Duran-PeñaDepartment of Neurology, Mazarin, Goupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Nicolas Menjot de ChamfleurDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Montpellier, Hopital Guy de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Antoine MoulignierDepartment of Neurology, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France.
Eric ThouvenotDepartment of Neurology, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Caremeau, Nîmes, France.
Thibaut AllouDepartment of Neurology, CHU Montpellier, Hopital Guy de Chauliac, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Arnaud LacourDepartment of Neurology, CHU De Lille, Lille, France.
Khe Hoang-XuanDepartment of Neurology, Mazarin, Goupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Jean PelletierAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, Marseille, France.
Pierre LabaugeDepartment of Neurology, CHU Montpellier, Hopital Guy de Chauliac, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRLaboratoire Charles Coulomb · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCerebral punctate and curvilinear gadolinium enhancements (PCGE) correspond to opacification of small vessel lumen or its perivascular areas in case of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption. We will discuss the possible causes of intra-parenchymal central nervous system PCGE.

methodsOur review is based on French database including patients presenting with central nervous system PCGE and literature search using PubMed database with the following keywords: punctate enhancement, linear enhancement, and curvilinear enhancement. Disorders which displayed linear leptomeningeal or periventricular enhancements without intra-parenchymal PCGE are excluded of this review.

resultsAmong our 39 patients with PCGE, 16 different diagnoses were established. After combining our PCGE causes with those described in the literature, we propose a practical approach. Besides physiologic post-contrast enhancement of small vessels, three pathologic conditions may exhibit PCGE: (1) small collateral artery network seen in Moyamoya syndrome, (2) small veins congestions related to developmental or acquired venous outflow disturbance, and (3) disorders causing small vessels BBB disruption indicated by T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities in the corresponding areas of PCGE. Disruption of the BBB could be caused by a direct injury of the endothelial cell, as in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, Susac syndrome, and radiochemotherapy-induced injuries, or by an angiocentric cellular infiltrate, as in inflammatory disorders, demyelinating diseases, host immune responses fighting against infections, prelymphoma states, lymphoma, and in CLIPPERS.

conclusionPCGE may conceal several causes, including physiological and pathological conditions. Nevertheless, a practical approach could improve its management and limit the indications of brain biopsy to very specific situations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainCerebrovascular DisordersContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaBlood-brain barrierCLIPPERSCurvilinear enhancementLinear enhancementPunctate enhancement

Identifiers

PMID26700824
OpenAlexW2216982070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.