Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700713›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Roadmap to Clinical Use of Gold Nanoparticles for Radiation Sensitization.

Jan Schuemann, Ross Berbeco, Devika B Chithrani, Sang Hyun Cho, Rajiv Kumar, Stephen J McMahon, Srinivas Sridhar, Sunil Krishnan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Monte Carlo Modeling of An Experimental Benchtop L-shell X-ray Fluorescence Imaging/CT System Adopting Two Silicone Drift Detectors.Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan SchuemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jschuemann@mgh.harvard.edu.
Ross BerbecoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Devika B ChithraniDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sang Hyun ChoDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rajiv KumarNanomedicine Science and Technology Center, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen J McMahonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Srinivas SridharNanomedicine Science and Technology Center, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sunil KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TOPAS - nBio, a Monte Carlo tool for radiation biology researchR01CA187003 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHUEMANN, JAN PATRICK OSCAR · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
Radiation response modulation of tumors using biocongjugated gold nanoparticlesR01CA155446 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHO, SANG HYUN, KRISHNAN, SUNIL · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Gold nanoparticles as vascular disruptig agents in radiation therapy of NSCLCR21CA188833 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BERBECO, ROSS I. · 2015 to 2016
$396k
Enhancing tumor vascular damage with gold nanoparticles aided radiation therapyR03CA164645 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BERBECO, ROSS I. · 2012 to 2013
$165k
NCI NIH HHS CA155446NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30CA16672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155446NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187003NCI NIH HHS R01CA187003NCI NIH HHS R03 CA164645NCI NIH HHS R03CA164645NCI NIH HHS R21 CA188833NCI NIH HHS R21CA188833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in interest in the use of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) as radiation sensitizers for radiation therapy. This interest was initially driven by their strong absorption of ionizing radiation and the resulting ability to increase dose deposited within target volumes even at relatively low concentrations. These early observations are supported by extensive experimental validation, showing GNPs' efficacy at sensitizing tumors in both in vitro and in vivo systems to a range of types of ionizing radiation, including kilovoltage and megavoltage X rays as well as charged particles. Despite this experimental validation, there has been limited translation of GNP-mediated radiation sensitization to a clinical setting. One of the key challenges in this area is the wide range of experimental systems that have been investigated, spanning a range of particle sizes, shapes, and preparations. As a result, mechanisms of uptake and radiation sensitization have remained difficult to clearly identify. This has proven a significant impediment to the identification of optimal GNP formulations which strike a balance among their radiation sensitizing properties, their specificity to the tumors, their biocompatibility, and their imageability in vivo. This white paper reviews the current state of knowledge in each of the areas concerning the use of GNPs as radiosensitizers, and outlines the steps which will be required to advance GNP-enhanced radiation therapy from their current pre-clinical setting to clinical trials and eventual routine usage.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Circulation TimeChemistry, PharmaceuticalGoldHumansMetal NanoparticlesMonte Carlo MethodNeoplasmsParticle SizePhotonsProton TherapyRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation ToleranceSurface PropertiesGoldRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID26700713
PMCPMC4692194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.