ArticleBMJ quality & safety2016
Plans to accelerate innovation in health systems are less than IDEAL.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis.Health research policy and systems · 2021Review
- Addressing Safe Opioid Prescribing: A Structured Framework for Organizational Needs Assessment.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2019Article
- Article
- Digital maturity: are we ready to use technology in the NHS?Future healthcare journal · 2017Article
- Scientific Paper Writing for Pediatric Surgeons: Why, What, and How?Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.