Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700472›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures.

Raceline Gounoue-Kamkumo, Hugues C Nana-Djeunga, Jean Bopda, Julie Akame, Ann Tarini, Joseph Kamgno

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raceline Gounoue-KamkumoCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), P.O. Box 5797, Yaounde, Cameroon. gounoue@crfilmt.org.
Hugues C Nana-DjeungaCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), P.O. Box 5797, Yaounde, Cameroon. nanadjeunga@crfilmt.org.
Jean BopdaCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), P.O. Box 5797, Yaounde, Cameroon. bopda@crfilmt.org.
Julie AkameHelen Keller International, P.O. Box 14227, Yaounde, Cameroon. jakame@hki.org.
Ann TariniHelen Keller International, P.O. Box 14227, Yaounde, Cameroon. tariniann@gmail.com.
Joseph KamgnoCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases (CRFilMT), P.O. Box 5797, Yaounde, Cameroon. kamgno@crfilmt.org.
Helen Keller International · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostic tools for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs are useful in mapping the distribution of the disease, delineating areas where mass drug administrations (MDA) are required, and determining when to stop MDA. The prevalence and burden of LF have been drastically reduced following mass treatments, and the evaluation of the performance of circulating filarial antigen (CFA)-based assays was acknowledged to be of high interest in areas with low residual LF endemicity rates after multiple rounds of MDA. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the immunochromatographic test (ICT) sensitivity in low endemicity settings and, specifically, in individuals with low intensity of lymphatic filariasis infection.

methodsTo perform this study, calibrated thick blood smears, ICT and Og4C3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were carried out by night to identify Wuchereria bancrofti microfilarial and circulating filarial antigen carriers. A threshold determination assay regarding ICT and ELISA was performed using serial plasma dilutions from individuals with positive microfilarial counts.

resultsAll individuals harbouring microfilariae (positive blood films) were detected by ICT and ELISA, but among individuals positive for ELISA, only 35.7 % of them were detected using ICT (Chi square: 4.57; p-value = 0.03), indicating a moderate agreement between both tests (kappa statistics = 0.49). Threshold determination analyses showed that ELISA was still positive at the last plasma dilution with negative ICT result.

conclusionsThese findings suggest a loss of sensitivity for ICT in low endemicity settings, especially in people exhibiting low levels of circulating filarial antigen, raising serious concern regarding the monitoring and evaluation procedures in the framework of LF elimination program.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, HelminthCameroonElephantiasis, FilarialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleSensitivity and SpecificityWuchereria bancroftiAntigens, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID26700472
PMCPMC4690254
OpenAlexW2214675549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.