Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700302›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Portrait of rural emergency departments in Québec and utilization of the provincial emergency department management Guide: cross sectional survey.

Richard Fleet, Julien Poitras, Patrick Archambault, Fatoumata Korika Tounkara, Jean-Marc Chauny, Mathieu Ouimet, Josée Gauthier, Gilles Dupuis, Alain Tanguay, Jean-Frédéric Lévesque and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disparities in Access to Trauma Care in Canada: A Geospatial Analysis of Census Data.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Population Access to Hospital Emergency Departments: The Spatial Analysis in Public Health Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Richard FleetDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada. rfleet@videotron.ca.
Julien PoitrasDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Patrick ArchambaultDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Fatoumata Korika TounkaraResearch Chair in Emergency Medicine Université Laval, CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis City, QC, Canada.
Jean-Marc ChaunyDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Montreal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Mathieu OuimetDepartment of political science, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Josée GauthierDirection de l'analyse et de l'évaluation des systèmes de soins et services, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada.
Gilles DupuisDépartement de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alain TanguayResearch Chair in Emergency Medicine Université Laval, CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis City, QC, Canada.
Jean-Frédéric LévesqueCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity of the University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Geneviève Simard-RacineDepartement of Emergency Medicine, CSSS de la Matapédia, Québec, QC, Canada.
Jeannie HaggertyMcGill Research Chair, Family and Community Medicine, Montréal, QC, Canada.
France LégaréDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment of the CHUQ Research Centre (CRCHUQ), Unité de Recherche Évaluative, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural emergency departments (EDs) constitute crucial safety nets for the 20% of Canadians who live in rural areas. Pilot data suggests that the province of Québec appears to provide more comprehensive access to services than do other provinces. A difference that may be attributable to provincial policy/guidelines "the provincial ED management Guide". The aim of this study was to provide a detailed description of rural EDs in Québec and utilization of the provincial ED management Guide.

methodsWe selected EDs offering 24/7 medical coverage, with hospitalization beds, located in rural or small towns. We collected data via telephone, paper, and online surveys with rural ED/hospital staff. Data were also collected from Québec's Ministry of Health databases and from Statistics Canada. We computed descriptive statistics, ANOVA and t-tests were used to examine the relationship between ED census, services and inter-facility transfer requirements.

resultsA total of 23 of Québec's 26 rural EDs (88%) consented to participate in the study. The mean annual ED visits was 18 813 (Standard Deviation = 6 151). Thirty one percent of ED physicians were recent graduates with fewer than 5 years of experience. Only 6 % had residency training or certification in emergency medicine. Teams have good local access (24/7) to diagnostic equipment such as CT scanner (74%), intensive unit care (78%) and general surgical services (78%), but limited access to other consultants. Sixty one percent of participants have reported good knowledge of the provincial ED management Guide, but only 23% of them have used the guidelines. Furthermore, more than 40% of EDs were more than 300 km from levels 1 to 2 trauma centers, and only 30% had air transport access.

conclusionsRural EDs in Québec are staffed by relatively new graduates working as solo physicians in well-resourced and moderately busy (by rural standards) EDs. The provincial ED management Guide may have contributed to this model of service attribution. However, the majority of rural ED staff report limited knowledge or use of the provincial ED management Guide and increased efforts at disseminating this Guide are warranted.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceCertificationClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ManagementEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, RuralHumansInternship and ResidencyLength of StayPhysiciansPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26700302
PMCPMC4690402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.