Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700294›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Integrated Primary Care Teams (IPCT) pilot project in Quebec: a protocol paper.

Damien Contandriopoulos, Arnaud Duhoux, Bernard Roy, Maxime Amar, Jean-Pierre Bonin, Roxane Borges Da Silva, Isabelle Brault, Clémence Dallaire, Carl-Ardy Dubois, Francine Girard and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Damien ContandriopoulosFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Arnaud DuhouxFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Bernard RoyFaculty of Nursing, University of Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Maxime AmarFaculty of Medicine, University of Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Jean-Pierre BoninFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Roxane Borges Da SilvaFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Isabelle BraultFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Clémence DallaireFaculty of Nursing, University of Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Carl-Ardy DuboisFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Francine GirardFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Emmanuelle JeanUniversity of Québec in Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
Caroline LarueFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Lily LessardUniversity of Québec in Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
Luc MathieuUniversity of Sherbrook, School of Nursing, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Jacinthe PépinFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Mélanie PerrouxFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1849-5913
Aurore CockenpotFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe overall aim of this project is to help develop knowledge about primary care delivery models likely to improve the accessibility, quality and efficiency of care. Operationally, this objective will be achieved through supporting and evaluating 8 primary care team pilot sites that rely on an expanded nursing role within a more intensive team-based, interdisciplinary setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The first research component is aimed at supporting the development and implementation of the pilot projects, and is divided into 2 parts. The first part is a logical analysis based on interpreting available scientific data to understand the causal processes by which the objectives of the intervention being studied may be achieved. The second part is a developmental evaluation to support teams in the field in a participatory manner and thereby learn from experience. Operationally, the developmental evaluation phase mainly involves semistructured interviews. The second component of the project design focuses on evaluating pilot project results and assessing their costs. This component is in turn made up of 2 parts. Part 1 is a pre-and-post survey of patients receiving the intervention care to analyse their care experience. In part 2, each patient enrolled in part 1 (around 4000 patients) will be matched with 2 patients followed within a traditional primary care model, so that a comparative analysis of the accessibility, quality and efficiency of the intervention can be performed. The cohorts formed in this way will be followed longitudinally for 4 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project, as well as all consent forms and research tools, have been accepted by 2 health sciences research ethics committees. The procedures used will conform to best practices regarding the anonymity of patients.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLongitudinal StudiesPatient Care TeamPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality Assurance, Health CareQuebecinterdisciplinarityPRIMARY CAREprimary healthcare team

Identifiers

PMID26700294
PMCPMC4691711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.