Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700290›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

Achieving change in primary care--effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews.

Rosa Lau, Fiona Stevenson, Bie Nio Ong, Krysia Dziedzic, Shaun Treweek, Sandra Eldridge, Hazel Everitt, Anne Kennedy, Nadeem Qureshi, Anne Rogers and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05099497 (Big Data and Little Behaviours), which is not on this map. Cited by 135 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05099497 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Big Data and Little Behaviours: Feedback and Quality Improvement Supports to Primary Care to Facilitate COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled600ConditionsCovid19 Vaccination, Vaccine UptakeArmsUsing Practice Facilitators to Support Physicians
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rosa LaueHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Fiona StevensoneHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Bie Nio OngArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care Sciences and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Krysia DziedzicArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care Sciences and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Shaun TreweekHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Sandra EldridgeCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Hazel EverittPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton,UK.
Anne KennedyFaculty of Health Sciences, NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Nadeem QureshiDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Anne RogersFaculty of Health Sciences, NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Richard PeacockArchway Healthcare Library, London, UK.
Elizabeth MurrayeHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of Health CAT CDRF 10-018Department of Health KMRF-2014-03-002Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.

designSystematic review of reviews. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Eligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Extracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.

results91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2-9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality.

conclusionsThere is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014009410.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareDeveloped CountriesHumansPrimary Health CareImplementationPRIMARY CARESystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26700290
PMCPMC4691771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.