Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26700130›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

The Role of Symmetric Stem Cell Divisions in Tissue Homeostasis.

Jienian Yang, Maksim V Plikus, Natalia L Komarova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. On Discretely Structured Growth Models and Their Moments.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Why are cell populations maintained via multiple compartments?Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stochastic reaction networks in dynamic compartment populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jienian YangDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Maksim V PlikusDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center and Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Natalia L KomarovaDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Aspirin and Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome: From Cell to Population DataU01CA187956 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI GOEL, AJAY, WODARZ, DOMINIK F · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
Induction of fat regeneration in skin wounds by hair follicle signalingR01AR067273 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI PLIKUS, MAKSIM V · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS 1 U01 CA187956-01NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187956NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067273NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR067273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful maintenance of cellular lineages critically depends on the fate decision dynamics of stem cells (SCs) upon division. There are three possible strategies with respect to SC fate decision symmetry: (a) asymmetric mode, when each and every SC division produces one SC and one non-SC progeny; (b) symmetric mode, when 50% of all divisions produce two SCs and another 50%-two non-SC progeny; (c) mixed mode, when both the asymmetric and two types of symmetric SC divisions co-exist and are partitioned so that long-term net balance of the lineage output stays constant. Theoretically, either of these strategies can achieve lineage homeostasis. However, it remains unclear which strategy(s) are more advantageous and under what specific circumstances, and what minimal control mechanisms are required to operate them. Here we used stochastic modeling to analyze and quantify the ability of different types of divisions to maintain long-term lineage homeostasis, in the context of different control networks. Using the example of a two-component lineage, consisting of SCs and one type of non-SC progeny, we show that its tight homeostatic control is not necessarily associated with purely asymmetric divisions. Through stochastic analysis and simulations we show that asymmetric divisions can either stabilize or destabilize the lineage system, depending on the underlying control network. We further apply our computational model to biological observations in the context of a two-component lineage of mouse epidermis, where autonomous lineage control has been proposed and notable regional differences, in terms of symmetric division ratio, have been noted-higher in thickened epidermis of the paw skin as compared to ear and tail skin. By using our model we propose a possible explanation for the regional differences in epidermal lineage control strategies. We demonstrate how symmetric divisions can work to stabilize paw epidermis lineage, which experiences high level of micro-injuries and a lack of hair follicles as a back-up source of SCs.

Indexed as

Epidermal CellsModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCells, CulturedComputer SimulationEpidermisFeedback, PhysiologicalHomeostasisHumansStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID26700130
PMCPMC4689538
OpenAlexW2216959482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.